TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Constitutional court of the Republic of Slovenia), Up-472/20-23, constitutional, 14 February 2024
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: European Convention on Human Rights, Articles 8, 10.ECtHR jurisprudence: Axel Springer AG v Germany of 7. 2. 2012 Piermont v France of 27. 4. 1995Jerusalem v Austria of 27. 2. 2001Lombardo and others v Malta of 24. 4. 2007Kubaszewski v Poland of 2. 2. 2010Otegi Mondragon v Spain of 15. 3. 2011Sanchez v France of 15. 5. 2023Féret v Belgium of 16. 7 .2009Lingens v Austria of 8.7. 1986Le Pen v France of 20. 4. 2010Khadija Ismayilova v Azerbajdžan of 7. 5. 2020Barata Monteiro de Costa Nogueira and Patricio Pereira v Portugal of 11. 1. 2011Handyside v the United Kingdom of 7. 12. 1976Sanocki v Poland of 17. 7. 2007Delfi AS v Estonia of 16. 6. 2015Oberschlick v Austria of 1. 7. 1997Bodrožić v Serbia of 23. 6. 2009Magyar Tartalomszolgáltatók Egyesülete in Index.hu Zrt v Hungary of 2. 2. 2016Gavrilovici v Moldavia of 15. 12. 2009Uj v Hungary of 19. 7. 2011Tuşalp v Turkey of 21. 2. 2012Otegi Mondragon v Spain of 15. 3. 2011Fuentes Bobo v Spain of 29. 2. 2000Savva Terentyev v Russia of 28. 8. 2018Lopes Gomes de Silva v Portugal of 28. 9. 2000Mesić v Croatia of 5. 5. 2022C8 (Canal8) v France of 9. 2. 2023
TRIIAL CASE
Italy, Court of Cassation, 19960, 30 January 2019
Deciding court: Court of Cassation
Topic: Independence, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, ECtHR, Application no. 22231/05, Case Lavric c. Romania, Judgment of 14 January 2014 (Final Judgment:14 April 2014)
Deciding court: Călărași District Court
Hunedoara County Court
Topic: Trust
- Relationship with media;
- Doxing towards prosecutors
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is NOT the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Dalban v. Romania ([GC], no. 28114/95, § 49, ECHR 1999-VI)
Timciuc v. Romania (no. 28999/03, §§ 95-97, 12 October 2010)
Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 40, ECHR 2003-III
Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 70, ECHR 2007-XIII)
Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007;
Petrina v. Romania, no. 78060/01, 14 October 2008, §§ 27-29 and 34-36
A.v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 64, 9 April 2009;
Mikolajová v. Slovakia, no. 4479/03, § 55, 18 January 2011;
Roberts and Roberts v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 38681/08, §§ 40-41, 5 July 2011
Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012
Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, §§ 66 and 68, ECHR 2001-I, and Von
Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 60, ECHR 2004-VI
Lešník v. Slovakia, no. 35640/97, § 54, ECHR 2003-IV
MGN Limitedv. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 150 and 155, 18 January 2011
Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06,
28959/06, 28964/06, § 57, 12 September 2011
Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012
Cumpǎnǎ and Mazǎre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 98, ECHR 2004-XI
Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 76, ECHR 2004-XI;
Timpul Info-Magazin and Anghel v. Moldova, no. 42864/05, § 37, 27 November 2007
Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway ([GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999-III
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court), núm. 142/2020, 19 of October of 2020
Deciding court: Constitutional Court
Topic: freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 10 ECHRECtHR judgment of June 30, 2015, Peruzzi v. Italy; ECtHR Judgment of January 12, 2016, Rodríguez Ravelo v. Spain system; ECtHR Judgment of October 8, 2019, LP and Carvalho v. Portugal
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Spanish Supreme Court), n. 73/2024, 25th of January of 2024
Deciding court: Spanish Supreme Court
Topic: freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 10 ECHRECtHR cases Rodríguez Ravelo v. Spain (2016) and Benitez Moriana and Iñigo Fernández v. Spain (2020)
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Tribunal Supremo (Spanish Supreme Court), n. 1217/2024, 8 of July of 2024
Deciding court: Spanish Supreme Court
Topic: freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 6 and 10 ECHRECtHR Judgment of 23 of April 23 of 2015, Morice v. France.
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Sąd Najwyższy (Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber), I NKRS 118/21, 12th January 2022, supreme
Deciding court: Supreme Court - Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber
Topic: independence, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Budapest Administrative and Labour Court, 70.M.1051/2018/36, ordinary, 10 May 2019
Deciding court: Budapest Administrative and Labour Court
Topic: independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): No
ECtHR jurisprudence: No
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Supreme Court, nº 121/2022, 2 February 2022
Deciding court: Supreme Court
Topic: impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Order I U 901/2014, ordinary, 17 December 2014, ECLI:SI:UPRS:2014:I.U.901.2014
Deciding court: Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Accountability, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Casado Coca v Spain (no. 15450/89)Nikula v Finland (no. 31611/96)Frankowicz v Poland (no. 53025/99)Veraart v the Netherlands (no. 10807/04)Steur v the Netherlands (no. 39657/98)
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy