Total Row: 390 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE

Italy, District Court of Naples, number and or name of the case, ordinary instance

Deciding court: District Court of Naples
Topic: Role of higher courts in securing fundamental rights
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable: the decision is a request for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU.
ECtHR jurisprudence: No reference to the ECtHR jurisprudence.
TRIIAL CASE

Hungary, Alkotmánybíróság (Constitutional Court of Hungary), 21/2014. (VII. 15.) AB, constitutional, 7 July 2014

Deciding court: Constitutional Court of Hungary
Topic:  accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): no
ECtHR jurisprudence: no
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, The Ethics and Integrity Commission, Decision Su Ek 7/2023-10 of 16 January 2024 – Are retired judges bound by judicial ethics?
Deciding court: Ethics and Integrity Commission of the Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Supreme Court, nº 121/2022, 2 February 2022
Deciding court: Supreme Court
Topic: impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Romania – Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) Case C-53/23 of 8 May 2024, ECLI:EU:C:2024:388 (request for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti (Court of Appeal Piteşti, Romania), made by decision of 31 January 2023, in the proceedings Asociația ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’, Asociația ‘Mișcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor’ v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: Rule of law, independence of the judiciary, Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania, Fight against corruption, Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system, Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations, Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow -up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: The ECHR jurisprudence was not referred to in this case.
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Superior Council of the Judiciary, April 2024
Deciding court: Superior Council of the Judiciary
Topic: Conflict of interests; individual judges’ liability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Italy, Constitutional Court, judgment 54/2022, constitutional instance, 11 January 2022,  published in the Italian Official Journal on 09/03/2022
Deciding court: Constitutional Court
Topic: Role of higher courts in securing fundamental rights
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): National follow-up of the CJEU decision in C-350/20.
ECtHR jurisprudence: No reference to ECtHR jurisprudence.
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Supreme Court, nº822/2023, 19 June 2023
Deciding court: Supreme Court
Topic:  independence, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 6.1 ECHR
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Superior Council of the Judiciary, July 2021
Deciding court: Superior Council of the Judiciary
Topic: Conflict of interests; individual judges’ liability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Supreme Court, Chamber of Professional Liability, II ZOW 47/22, acting as appelate court
Deciding court: Supreme Court
Topic: Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
Total Row: 390 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy