TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Constitutional Court, 711/2020, 9th December 2020
Deciding court: Constitutional Court
Topic: Fundamental Rights
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi (The Administrative Body for Contractual Resources of the Autonomous Community of Euskadi), 14 of march of 2024.
Deciding court: The Administrative Body for Contractual Resources of the Autonomous Community of Euskadi
Topic: Fundamental rights
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO
ECtHR jurisprudence: NO
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Court of Justice of the European Union, C-462/19 of 16 September 2020
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: CJUE jurisdiction
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO
ECtHR jurisprudence: NO
TRIIAL CASE
Czech Republic, Nejvyšší správní soud (Supreme Administrative Court), 10 Azs 53/2022-46, 23. 11. 2023
Deciding court: Supreme Administrative Court
Topic:
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The cited decision is a preliminary reference. The case is still pending.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 6(1) of the European Convention on Human RightsDecision of the ECtHR [GC] from 19. 9. 2017, Regner v Czech Republic, application no. 35289/11Decision of the ECtHR [GC] from 16. 2. 2000, Fitt v the United Kingdom, application no. 29777/96Decision of the ECtHR [GC] from 15. 12. 2015, Schatschaschwili v Germany, application no. 9154/10Decision of the ECtHR [GC] from 15. 10. 2020 ve věci Muhammad and Muhammad v Romania, application no. 80982/12Dcision of the ECtHR from 9. 3. 2021, Hassine V Romania, application no. 36328/13
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Sąd Najwyższy (Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber), I NKRS 118/21, 12th January 2022, supreme
Deciding court: Supreme Court - Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber
Topic: independence, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Budapest Administrative and Labour Court, 70.M.1051/2018/36, ordinary, 10 May 2019
Deciding court: Budapest Administrative and Labour Court
Topic: independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): No
ECtHR jurisprudence: No
TRIIAL CASE
Order of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Ninth Chamber), C-95/22, ECLI:EU:C:2022:697
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: Independence and accountability of the judiciary
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber), C-58/22, ECLI:EU:C:2024:70
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: Independence and accountability of the judiciary
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The Judgment of the Court in case C- 58/22 represents the response to the request made by a national ordinary court, Court of Appeal, Craiova, as follow-up of a judgment in a criminal matter, issued by the High Court of Cassation and Justice, Romania, within an cassation appeal. By this Decision, the High Court of Cassation and Justice found that the that Court of Appeal Craiova wrongfully applied the principle ne bis in idem. In the context of reconsideration of its decision, the referring court raised a question of the interpretation to be given to the principle ne bis in idem, within the meaning of Article 50 of the Charter, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Mihalache v. Romania, CE:ECHR:2019:0708JUD005401210
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Supreme Court, nº 121/2022, 2 February 2022
Deciding court: Supreme Court
Topic: impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Romania – Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) Case C-53/23 of 8 May 2024, ECLI:EU:C:2024:388 (request for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti (Court of Appeal Piteşti, Romania), made by decision of 31 January 2023, in the proceedings Asociația ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’, Asociația ‘Mișcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor’ v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: Rule of law, independence of the judiciary, Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania, Fight against corruption, Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system, Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations, Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow -up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: The ECHR jurisprudence was not referred to in this case.
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy