Total Row: 428 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE

Hungary, Miskolci Törvényszék (Miskolc Regional Court), ordinary, C-477/21, 2 March 2023

Deciding court: Miskolc Regional Court
Topic: mutual trust, rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): no
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Fővárosi Törvényszék (Metropolitan Court of Budapest), ordinary, C-247/23, 18 April 2023
Deciding court: Metropolitan Court of Budapest
Topic: mutual trust, rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): no
ECtHR jurisprudence: Rana v Hungary, no. 40888/18, 16 July 2020
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Szegedi Törvényszék (Szeged Regional Court), Joined cases C‑420/22 and C‑528/22, NW and PQ, 25 April 2024
Deciding court: Szeged Regional Court
Topic: mutual trust, rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: no
TRIIAL CASE

Romania, ECtHR, Application no. 22231/05, Case Lavric c. Romania, Judgment of 14 January 2014 (Final Judgment:14 April 2014) 

Deciding court: Călărași District Court Hunedoara County Court
Topic:  Trust  - Relationship with media;  - Doxing towards prosecutors
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is NOT the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Dalban v. Romania ([GC], no. 28114/95, § 49, ECHR 1999-VI) Timciuc v. Romania (no. 28999/03, §§ 95-97, 12 October 2010) Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 40, ECHR 2003-III  Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 70, ECHR 2007-XIII) Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007;  Petrina v. Romania, no. 78060/01, 14 October 2008, §§ 27-29 and 34-36 A.v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 64, 9 April 2009;  Mikolajová v. Slovakia, no. 4479/03, § 55, 18 January 2011;  Roberts and Roberts v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 38681/08, §§ 40-41, 5 July 2011  Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012 Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, §§ 66 and 68, ECHR 2001-I, and Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 60, ECHR 2004-VI Lešník v. Slovakia, no. 35640/97, § 54, ECHR 2003-IV MGN Limitedv. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 150 and 155, 18 January 2011 Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06, 28964/06, § 57, 12 September 2011   Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012 Cumpǎnǎ and Mazǎre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 98, ECHR 2004-XI Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 76, ECHR 2004-XI;  Timpul Info-Magazin and Anghel v. Moldova, no. 42864/05, § 37, 27 November 2007 Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway ([GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999-III
TRIIAL CASE
Czech Republic, Nejvyšší správní soud (Supreme Administrative Court), 7 As 172/2022-49, 26.1.2023
Deciding court: Supreme Administrative Court
Topic: Fundamental Rights
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The cited decision is a preliminary reference. The case is still pending.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 8 of the European Convention on Human RightsDecision of the ECtHR from 13. 2. 2020, Trajkovski and Chipovski v North Macedonia, applications no. 53205/13 and 63320/13Decision of the ECtHR from 13. 2. 2020, Gaughran v the United Kingdom, application no. 45245/15Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 6. 2017, Aycaguer v France, application no. 8806/12Decision of the ECtHR [GC] from 4. 12. 2008, S. and Marper v the United Kingdom, applications no. 30562/04 and 30566/04
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Court of Justice of the European Union, C-473/22, Judgment of 16 of May of 2024
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: Social Policy – use of the preliminary reference procedure
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): No
ECtHR jurisprudence: No
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Supreme Court - Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 26 November 2021, C-720/21
Deciding court: Supreme Court
Topic:
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Dolinska-Ficek and Ozimek v. Poland, 8.11.2021
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Sąd Najwyższy (Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber), I NKRS 118/21, 12th January 2022, supreme
Deciding court: Supreme Court - Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber
Topic: independence, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Budapest Administrative and Labour Court, 70.M.1051/2018/36, ordinary, 10 May 2019
Deciding court: Budapest Administrative and Labour Court
Topic: independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): No
ECtHR jurisprudence: No
TRIIAL CASE
Spain, Supreme Court, nº 121/2022, 2 February 2022
Deciding court: Supreme Court
Topic: impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
Total Row: 428 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy