Portugal, Social media and the Rui Pinto case, 2020
Accountability, the use of social media
Not applicable.
2020
The use of social media
The legal issue here is whether a judge, who has been assigned a case, can continue in that case after discovering that he has several publications on social networks that can compromise his impartiality, as they are indirectly linked to a defendant.
Article 202 of the Portuguese Constitution.
Rui Pinto is a Portuguese hacker known worldwide, since he exposed certain cases of corruption ranging from football to politics. In football, the main target football club is Benfica.
Rui Pinto is in Portugal and awaits trial. In April 2020 it was reported that the judge who would be responsible for judging Rui Pinto has several publications on Facebook that gives an account of his affectionate relationship with Benfica.
In addition, it should be added that this judge, according to Rui Pinto's defense lawyers, took a public position of condemnation on the case, supporting publications on social media that call Rui Pinto a «pirate».
In this sequence, Rui Pinto's defense lawyers asked the court to remove the judge from the case. After this request, the judge in question also asked to be removed, which was accepted.
As this was a situation where a judge made a comment sustained in his freedom of expression, see the main template regarding freedom of expression of judges, where it can be found the general panorama regarding this topic in Portugal.
Not available.