TRIIAL CASE
European Union, Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Case C-633/22, Real Madrid Club de Fútbol and AE v. EE and Société Éditrice du Monde SA, Grand Chamber (Preliminary Ruling), 4 October 2024, ECLI:EU:C:2024:843.
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: Freedom of expression, mutual trust, and impartiality.
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not a direct follow-up of a prior CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Morice v. France (CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD002936910) – Limits on restrictions in matters of public interest; Colaco Mestre and SIC v. Portugal (CE:ECHR:2007:0426JUD001118203) – Sports as public interest; Błaja News v. Poland (CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD005954510) – Financial penalties must not threaten media viability; Steel and Morris v. UK (CE:ECHR:2005:0215JUD006841601) – Proportionality of damages in defamation; Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associes v. France (CE:ECHR:2015:1110JUD004045407) – Scrutiny of sanctions to avoid chilling effects.
TRIIAL CASE
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, Société Pirelli & C. v. Société Licensing Projects, no. 11-27770, 28 March 2013
Deciding court: French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
Topic: Rule of law – the right to a fair trial/access to justice
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The judgment of the Versailles Court of Appeal
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Société Cubic Defense Systems Inc. v Chambre de Commerce Internationale, Cour de Cassation, 1st Civil Chamber, 20 February 2001
Deciding court: French Supreme Court
Topic: Accountability: Arbitral institutions can be, in principle, held liable for the breach of their contractual duties under French law.
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Ν/Α
ECtHR jurisprudence: Ν/Α
TRIIAL CASE
Paris Court of Appeal, S.N.F. S.A.S v La Chambre de Commerce Internationale
Deciding court: Paris Court of Appeal
Topic: Accountability/civiliability of arbitral institutions
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE
France, Mutual Trust, Administrative Court of Toulouse, judgement of 27/11/2017, no. 1705421
Deciding court: Administrative Court of Toulouse
Topic: Mutual Trust, Asylum (Dublin III Regulation)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not a direct follow up
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE
France, Mutual Trust, Administrative Court of Lyon, judgement of 3/04/2017, no. 1702564
Deciding court: Administrative Court of Lyon
Topic: Mutual Trust, Asylum (Dublin regulation)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not a direct follow up
ECtHR jurisprudence:
Article 3 ECHR
ECtHR, judgement of 23 March 2016, F.G. v Sweden, app. No. 43611/11
TRIIAL CASE
France, Mutual Trust, Administrative Court of Appeal of Lyon (Fifth Chamber), judgement of 29/09/2020, no. 20LY01579
Deciding court: Administrative Court of Appeal of Lyon
Topic: Mutual Trust, Asylum (Dublin III Regulation)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not a direct follow up
ECtHR jurisprudence:
Article 3 ECHR
TRIIAL CASE
France, Mutual Trust, Administrative Court of Appeal of Lyon (Second Chamber), judgement of 3/04/2018, no. 17LY02181 – 17LY02184
Deciding court: Administrative Court of Appeal of Lyon
Topic: Mutual Trust, Asylum (Dublin III Regulation)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not a direct follow up
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE
France, Mutual Trust, Administrative Court of Appeal of Nantes (Fourth Chamber), judgement of 8/06/2018, no. 17NT03167 – 17NT03174
Deciding court: Administrative Court of Appeal of Nantes
Topic: Mutual Trust, Asylum (Dublin III Regulation)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not a direct follow up
ECtHR jurisprudence:
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy