Total Row: 31 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Supreme Court, BSA I-4110-1/20, January 2020

Deciding court: Supreme Court (Resolution of the combined Civil Chamber, Criminal Chamber and Labour Law and Social Security Chamber) 
Topic: Independence of judges/proper appointment of judges/National Council of Judiciary  Accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: ECtHR:  Judgment of 12 March 2019, 26374/18, Guđmundur Andri Ástráđsson v. Iceland, issued in the context of Article 6(1) ECHR;  
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Supreme Court - dissenting opinion, BSA I-4110-1/20, 23 January 2020

Deciding court: Supreme Court (Resolution of the combined Civil Chamber, Criminal Chamber and Labour Law and Social Security Chamber) 
Topic: Independence of judges/proper appointment of judges/National Council of Judiciary 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: ECtHR:  Judgment of 12 March 2019, 26374/18, Guđmundur Andri Ástráđsson v. Iceland, issued in the context of Article 6(1) ECHR;  
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Supreme Court - Dissenting opinion, BSA I-4110-1-2020, 23 January 2020

Deciding court: Supreme Court (Resolution of the combined Civil Chamber, Criminal Chamber and Labour Law and Social Security Chamber)  Votum Separatum of SCJ Krzysztof Staryk to the judgment. 
Topic: Independence of judges/proper appointment of judges/National Council of Judiciary 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: ECtHR:  Judgment of 12 March 2019, 26374/18, Guđmundur Andri Ástráđsson v. Iceland, issued in the context of Article 6(1) ECHR;  
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Constitutional Court, P 16/19, 10 December 2019

Deciding court: Constitutional Court  
Topic: Rule of law, access to justice, terms for lodging the complaint
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable 
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Constitutional court, P 9/18, 26 November 2019

Deciding court: Constitutional Court  
Topic: Rule of law, access to justice, meaning of the “court” and “case” 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable 
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Supreme Administrative court, I OSK 4282/18, 2 June 2018

Deciding court: Supreme Administrative Court 
Topic: Trust – Judicial Transparency 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, National Council of Judiciary, resolution, 626/2018, 12 December 2018

Deciding court: National Council of Judiciary
Topic: Trust 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Deputy Disciplinary Commissioner for Judges, 17 January 2020

Deciding court: Deputy Disciplinary Commisioner for Judges  
Topic: Trust  
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Supreme court, I NO 192/19, 2 June 2020

Deciding court: Supreme Court 
Topic: Independence of judges – promotion of judges 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Not applicable 
TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Commissioner of Human Rights, Letter, VII.501.53.2020.MW/CW, 9 March 2020

Deciding court: Commissioner of Human Rights (ombudsman) 
Topic: Trust
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable 
ECtHR jurisprudence: Baka vs Hungary – 20261/12; par 165-167
Total Row: 31 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy