Deciding court: Cluj Court of Appeal - Court of Justice of the European Union

Topic: fundamental rights, rule of law

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

Deciding court: County Court

Topic: Freedom of expression

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

Deciding court: Regional Court

Topic: Freedom of expression

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

Deciding court: County Court

Topic: Freedom of expression

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

Deciding court: Călărași District Court Hunedoara County Court

Topic:  Trust  - Relationship with media;  - Doxing towards prosecutors

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is NOT the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.

Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union

Topic: Rule of law, independence of the judiciary, Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania, Fight against corruption, Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system, Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations, Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow -up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.

Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights

Topic: mutual trust, accountability, rule of law

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The decision of the ECHR is executed by the Romanian state. (Resolution CM/ResDH(2024)102 adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 June 2024.

Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union

Topic: Independence and accountability of the judiciary

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union / Romanian Constitutional Court

Topic: Rule of law, independence of the judiciary

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The Judgment of the Court in the Case C-107/23 PPU represents the response to the request made by a national ordinary court, Curtea de Apel Brasov (Court of Appeal, Brasov, Romania) as follow-up of the Decision no. 297/26.04.2018 and Decision no. 358/26.05.2022 of the Romanian Constitutional Court and Decision no. 67/2022 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania, which clarify the way it should be judged a national case as regards the criminal limitation period for criminal liability especially in criminal cases of crimes against financial interest of European Union

Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union/Court of Appeal Constanta

Topic: Mutual trust

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The Judgment of the Court in case C-396/11 Ciprian Vasile Radu represents the response to the request made by a national ordinary court, Curtea de Apel Constanța (Court of Appeal, Constanța, Romania). Law no. 300 of November 15, 2013, published in Official Gazette of Romania no. 772 of 11 December 2013 provides multiple changes of the European arrest warrant: issuing authority and procedure, transmission for execution and translation of the European arrest warrant; additional information and guarantees; temporary surrender or hearing of the requested person during the European Arrest Warrant surrender procedure; refusal of surrender; procedure on arrest of the requested person – hearing of the requested person; postponed surrender.Decision of the Constitutional Court no. 712 of December 4, 2014, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 33 of January 15, 2015 qualified as unconstitutional Articles 211-217 of Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, articles relevant for the application of Article 104 of the Law no. 302 of 2004 on judicial cooperation in criminal matters: “If the requested person is set at liberty, the court orders against him the measure of judicial control, judicial control on bail or house arrest, the provisions of Art. 211-222 of the Criminal Procedure Code) applying accordingly. In this case, in the situation where, subsequently, the court orders the execution of the European arrest warrant, through the surrender decision, the arrest of the requested person is also ordered to surrender to the issuing judicial authority.”