TRIIAL CASE
European Court of Human Rights, Danoiu and others – app no 54780/15 and two others, Judgement of 25 January 2022, Fourth Section
Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights
Topic: mutual trust, independence, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The case before the national courts is not the result of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art 1 Protocol 1 - ECHRECtHR, Scordino v Italia (nr. 1) (MC), app no. 36813/97, paras. 78, 2006ECtHR J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd și J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. Regatului Unit (MC), app no. 44302/02, paras. 52, 2007ECtHR Vistiđš și Perepjolkins v.Letonia (MC), app. no. 71243/01, paras. 93, 2012.ECtHR Radomilja and others v Croației (MC), app no. 37685/10 și 22768/12, paras. 149, 2018ECtHR Maurice v Franța (MC), app no. 11810/03, paras. 90-93, 2005ECtHR Capital Bank AD împotriva Bulgariei, nr. 49429/99, paras 135-140, 2005.
TRIIAL CASE
European Court of Human Rights Mateut v. Romania – app. nr. 35959/15, decision of 1 March 2022, Fourth Section
Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights
Topic: mutual trust, accountability, rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 8, art 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental FreedomsEtCHR Pruteanu v Romania, app no 30181/05, 2015EtCHR Bourdov c Rusia, app no 59498/00, 2002EtCHR Centro Europa 7 S.RL. et Di Stefano c. Italie [GC], no 38433/09, 2012EtCHR Scordino c. Italie (no1) [GC], no 36813/97, 2006EtCHR Ben Faiza c. France, no 31446/12, 2018EtCHR Mucea c Romania, app no 24591/07, 2016 EtCHR Vasil Vasilev c. Bulgarie, no 7610/15, 2021
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, ECtHR, Application no. 22231/05, Case Lavric c. Romania, Judgment of 14 January 2014 (Final Judgment:14 April 2014)
Deciding court: Călărași District Court
Hunedoara County Court
Topic: Trust
- Relationship with media;
- Doxing towards prosecutors
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is NOT the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Dalban v. Romania ([GC], no. 28114/95, § 49, ECHR 1999-VI)
Timciuc v. Romania (no. 28999/03, §§ 95-97, 12 October 2010)
Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 40, ECHR 2003-III
Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 70, ECHR 2007-XIII)
Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007;
Petrina v. Romania, no. 78060/01, 14 October 2008, §§ 27-29 and 34-36
A.v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 64, 9 April 2009;
Mikolajová v. Slovakia, no. 4479/03, § 55, 18 January 2011;
Roberts and Roberts v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 38681/08, §§ 40-41, 5 July 2011
Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012
Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, §§ 66 and 68, ECHR 2001-I, and Von
Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 60, ECHR 2004-VI
Lešník v. Slovakia, no. 35640/97, § 54, ECHR 2003-IV
MGN Limitedv. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 150 and 155, 18 January 2011
Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06,
28959/06, 28964/06, § 57, 12 September 2011
Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012
Cumpǎnǎ and Mazǎre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 98, ECHR 2004-XI
Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 76, ECHR 2004-XI;
Timpul Info-Magazin and Anghel v. Moldova, no. 42864/05, § 37, 27 November 2007
Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway ([GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999-III
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, The European Court of Human Rights, Fernandes de Araújo v. Romania, application no. 10772/21; Judgment of 16 April 2024
Deciding court: The European Court of Human Rights
Topic: Mutual trust
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights● ECHR, Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, Judgment of 25 January 2000, 31679/96;● ECHR, Shaw v. Hungary, Judgment of 26 July 2011, 6457/09;● ECHR, Strumia v. Italy, Judgment of 23 June 2016, 53377/13;● ECHR, I.M. and Others v. Italy, Judgment of 10 November 2022, 25426/20.
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, Decision nr. 9P/13.09.2023 of the Section for prosecutors in disciplinary matters in Case file nr. 9/P/2022, definitive by Court Decision nr. 54/ 18.03.2024 of ICCJ (Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice) in case file nr. 2748/1/2023
Deciding court: Romanian High Court of Casation and Justice
Topic: impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NOT RELEVANT
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, Decision nr. 10P/13.09.2023 of the Section for prosecutors in disciplinary matters in Case file nr. 6/P/2022, definitive by Court Decision nr. 74/ 18.03.2024 of ICCJ (Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice) in case file nr. 2817/1/2023
Deciding court: Romanian High Court of Casation and Justice
Topic: impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NOT RELEVANT
ECtHR jurisprudence: The European Convention of Human RightsCase Eminagaoglu vs. Turkey, ECHR, Application no. 76521/12, Final decision of 05/07/2021.
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, Bucharest Court of Appeal, AAAA v. BB, ordinary, Judgment no. 468 of 9 March 2022, publication series (not applicable)
Deciding court: Bucharest Court of Appeal
Topic: Mutual Trust, Judicial Independence and Judicial Cooperation in Asylum
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: No ECtHR judgments have been provided in the national decision.
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, The High Court of Cassation and Justice, case no. 2833/1/2023, supreme instance, Civil decision no. 52 of 11 March 2024
Deciding court: The High Court of Cassation and Justice
Topic: impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights; Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, Curtea de Apel Cluj, Preliminary reference - Case C‑201/14, Bara and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2015:638
Deciding court: Cluj Court of Appeal - Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: fundamental rights, rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Romania – Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) Case C-53/23 of 8 May 2024, ECLI:EU:C:2024:388 (request for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti (Court of Appeal Piteşti, Romania), made by decision of 31 January 2023, in the proceedings Asociația ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’, Asociația ‘Mișcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor’ v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: Rule of law, independence of the judiciary, Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania, Fight against corruption, Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system, Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations, Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow -up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: The ECHR jurisprudence was not referred to in this case.
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy