Total Row: 63 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Higher Court of Ljubljana, II Cp 1565/2021, appellate, 13 April 2022, ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2022:II.CP.1565.2021
Deciding court: Higher Court of Ljubljana
Topic: Freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Karsai v. Hungary (ECtHR, 1 December 2009)Tavares de Almeida Fernandes and Almeida Fernandes v. Portugal (ECtHR, 17 January 2017)Dichand and Others v. Austria (ECtHR, 26 February 2002)Feldek v. Slovakia (ECtHR, 12 July 2001)
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Up-429/23-13, constitutional, 24 October 2024, ECLI:SI:USRS:2024:Up.429.23
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence, impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 6 ECHRFey v. Austria, App. no. 14396/88, 24 February 1993Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, Application no. 19874/92, 7 August 1996, para. 58Švarc and Kavnik v. Slovenia, Application no. 75617/01, 8 February 2007, para. 39Pullar v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 22399/93, 10 June 1996, para. 32Mitrinovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Application No. 6899/12, 30 April 2015, para. 36Parlov-Tkalčić v. Croatia, 22 December 2009.Daktaras v. Lithuania, 10 October 2000.Findlay v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997.Bochan v. Ukraine, 3 May 2007.Puolitaival and Pirttiaho v. Finland, 23 November 2004.Borgers v. Belgium, 30 October 1991.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Information Commissioner, Opinion no. 07121-1/2021/2502, 21 December 2021
Deciding court: Information Commissioner of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Su 12/2023-13, instance: ordinary, 11 May 2023
Deciding court: Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic:  Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision U-I-50/21-39, constitutional, 17 June 2021
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Freedom of expression, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Venice Commission, Guidelines on Freedom of Peaceful Assembly, 3rd edition, 8 July 2019.FRA, fra.europa.eu Djavit An v Turkey, 20 February 2003Kudrevičius and Others v Lithuania, 15 October 2015Ezelin v France, 26 April 1991Primov and Others v Russia, 12 June 2014Sáska v Hungary, 27 November 2012Frumkin v RussiaGalstyan v Armenia, 15 November 2007Elvira Dmitriyeva v Russia, 30 April 2019Perinçek v Switzerland, 15 October 2015EComHR, Christians against Racism and Fascism v the UK, 17 July 1980.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court of Slovenia, Decision U-I-152/17-13, constitutional, 4 July 2019, ECLI:SI:USRS:2019:U.I.152.17
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of Slovenia
Topic: Rule of law and predictive Justice
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: -    Article 8 of ECHR-    Article 2 of Protocol 4 to the ECHR-    Benedik v Slovenia, 24. 4. 2018.-    S. and Marper v the UK, 4. 12. 2008.-    Surikov v Ukraine, 26. 1. 2017.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court, U-I-445/18, 14 October 2021, ECLI:SI:USRS:2021:U.I.445.18
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence (removal of magistrates, legal remedies for individual judges against dismissal decisions), accountability (Councils of the judiciary)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): VSRS Judgement and Order, no. U 2/2018-17 of 14 December 2021
ECtHR jurisprudence: Olujić v the Republic of Croatia, app. no. 22330/05, 5 February 2009,Fey v Austria, app. no. 14396/88, 24 February 1993,Ferrantelli and Santangelo v Italy, app. no. 19874/92, 7 August 1996, Švarc and Kavnik v Slovenia, app. no. 75617/01, 8 February 2007, Pullar v the United Kingdom, app. no. 22399/93, 10 June 1996, Mitrinovski v the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, app. no. 6899/12, 30 April 2015, Piersack v Belgium, app. no. 8692/79, 1 October 1982, Grieves v the United Kingdom, app. no. 57067/00, 16 October 2003, Miller and Others v the United Kingdom, app. nos. 45825/99, 45826/99 and 45827/99, 26 October 2004,Kyprianou v Cyprus, app. no. 73797/01,15 December 2005, Puolitaival and Pirttiaho v Finland, app. no. 54857/00, 23 November 2004,Mežnarič v Croatia, app. no. 71615/01,15 July 2005,Daktaras v Lithuania, app. no. 42095/98, 10 October 2000.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Supreme Court, U 6/2020-29, administrative, supreme, 7 October 2020. 
Deciding court: Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Impartiality (dismissal and appointment of members of the Judicial Council), Independence (removal of magistrates, legal remedies for individual judges against dismissal decisions)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Steck-Risch and others v Lichtenstein, app. no. 63151/00, 19 May 2005.The following three cases are relevant, but were not invoked by the Judicial Council:A.K. v Lichtenstein, app. no. 38191/12, 9 July 2015.Micallef v Malta, app. no. 17056/06, 15 October 2009.Nicholas v Cyprus, app. no. 63246/10, 9 January 2018.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision U-I-192/23-13, constitutional, 1 February 2024, ECLI:SI:USRS:2024:U.I.192.23
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Administrative Court, I U 1478/2016-19, ordinary, 30 August 2017, ECLI:SI:UPRS:2017:I.U.1478.2016.19

Deciding court: Administrative Court of Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence (removal of magistrates, legal remedies for individual judges against dismissal decisions), accountability (Councils of the judiciary)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland (app. no. 632335/00, Grand Chamber, 19 April 2007) Oleksander Volkov v. Ukraine (app. no. 21722/11, 9 January 2013) Baka v. Hungary (app. no. 20261/12, Grand Chamber, 23 June 2016) G v. Finland (app. no. 33173/05, 27 January 2009) Harabin v. Slovakia (app. no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012) Olujić v. Croatia (app. no. 22330/05, 5 February 2005) Mitrinovski v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (app. no. 6899/12, 30 April 2015) Parlov-Tkalčič v. Croatia (app. no. 24810/06, 22 December 2009) Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland (app. no. 23614/0830 November 2010  Maktouf and Damjanović v. BiH (app. nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, Grand Chamber, 18 July 2013) Paluda v. Slovakia, (app. no. 33392/12, 23 May 2017) Saghatelyan v. Armenia, (app. no. 7984/06, 20 October 2015) Poposki and Duma v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (app. nos. 69916/10 and 36531/11,  7 January 2016) Jakšovski and Trifunovski v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, (app nos. 5681/09 and 58738/09, 7 January 2016) Moiseyev v. Russia (app. no. 62936, 9 October 2008) Agrokompleks v. Ukraine (app. no.23465/03, 6 October 2011) Scordino v. Italy, (no.1) (app. no. 36813/97, 29 March 2006, Grand Chamber) Hirschhorn v. Romania (app. no. 29294/02, 26 July 2007) Hornsby v. Greece (app. no. 18357/91, 19 March 1997) Kyrtatos v. Greece (app. no. 41666/98, 22 May 2003) Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy (app. no. 22774/93, 28 July 1999) Matheus c. France (app. no. 62740/00, 31 March 2005) Sabin Popescu v. Romania (app. no. 48102/99, 2 March 2004)
Total Row: 63 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy