Total Row: 54 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Information Commissioner, Opinion no. 07121-1/2021/2502, 21 December 2021
Deciding court: Information Commissioner of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court of Slovenia, Decision U-I-152/17-13, constitutional, 4 July 2019, ECLI:SI:USRS:2019:U.I.152.17
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of Slovenia
Topic: Rule of law and predictive Justice
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: -    Article 8 of ECHR-    Article 2 of Protocol 4 to the ECHR-    Benedik v Slovenia, 24. 4. 2018.-    S. and Marper v the UK, 4. 12. 2008.-    Surikov v Ukraine, 26. 1. 2017.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Su 12/2023-13, instance: ordinary, 11 May 2023
Deciding court: Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic:  Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court, U-I-445/18, 14 October 2021, ECLI:SI:USRS:2021:U.I.445.18
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence (removal of magistrates, legal remedies for individual judges against dismissal decisions), accountability (Councils of the judiciary)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): VSRS Judgement and Order, no. U 2/2018-17 of 14 December 2021
ECtHR jurisprudence: Olujić v the Republic of Croatia, app. no. 22330/05, 5 February 2009,Fey v Austria, app. no. 14396/88, 24 February 1993,Ferrantelli and Santangelo v Italy, app. no. 19874/92, 7 August 1996, Švarc and Kavnik v Slovenia, app. no. 75617/01, 8 February 2007, Pullar v the United Kingdom, app. no. 22399/93, 10 June 1996, Mitrinovski v the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, app. no. 6899/12, 30 April 2015, Piersack v Belgium, app. no. 8692/79, 1 October 1982, Grieves v the United Kingdom, app. no. 57067/00, 16 October 2003, Miller and Others v the United Kingdom, app. nos. 45825/99, 45826/99 and 45827/99, 26 October 2004,Kyprianou v Cyprus, app. no. 73797/01,15 December 2005, Puolitaival and Pirttiaho v Finland, app. no. 54857/00, 23 November 2004,Mežnarič v Croatia, app. no. 71615/01,15 July 2005,Daktaras v Lithuania, app. no. 42095/98, 10 October 2000.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision U-I-192/23-13, constitutional, 1 February 2024, ECLI:SI:USRS:2024:U.I.192.23
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Order I U 901/2014, ordinary, 17 December 2014, ECLI:SI:UPRS:2014:I.U.901.2014
Deciding court: Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Accountability, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Casado Coca v Spain (no. 15450/89)Nikula v Finland (no. 31611/96)Frankowicz v Poland (no. 53025/99)Veraart v the Netherlands (no. 10807/04)Steur v the Netherlands (no. 39657/98)
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Administrative Court, I U 1478/2016-19, ordinary, 30 August 2017, ECLI:SI:UPRS:2017:I.U.1478.2016.19

Deciding court: Administrative Court of Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence (removal of magistrates, legal remedies for individual judges against dismissal decisions), accountability (Councils of the judiciary)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland (app. no. 632335/00, Grand Chamber, 19 April 2007) Oleksander Volkov v. Ukraine (app. no. 21722/11, 9 January 2013) Baka v. Hungary (app. no. 20261/12, Grand Chamber, 23 June 2016) G v. Finland (app. no. 33173/05, 27 January 2009) Harabin v. Slovakia (app. no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012) Olujić v. Croatia (app. no. 22330/05, 5 February 2005) Mitrinovski v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (app. no. 6899/12, 30 April 2015) Parlov-Tkalčič v. Croatia (app. no. 24810/06, 22 December 2009) Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland (app. no. 23614/0830 November 2010  Maktouf and Damjanović v. BiH (app. nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, Grand Chamber, 18 July 2013) Paluda v. Slovakia, (app. no. 33392/12, 23 May 2017) Saghatelyan v. Armenia, (app. no. 7984/06, 20 October 2015) Poposki and Duma v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (app. nos. 69916/10 and 36531/11,  7 January 2016) Jakšovski and Trifunovski v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, (app nos. 5681/09 and 58738/09, 7 January 2016) Moiseyev v. Russia (app. no. 62936, 9 October 2008) Agrokompleks v. Ukraine (app. no.23465/03, 6 October 2011) Scordino v. Italy, (no.1) (app. no. 36813/97, 29 March 2006, Grand Chamber) Hirschhorn v. Romania (app. no. 29294/02, 26 July 2007) Hornsby v. Greece (app. no. 18357/91, 19 March 1997) Kyrtatos v. Greece (app. no. 41666/98, 22 May 2003) Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy (app. no. 22774/93, 28 July 1999) Matheus c. France (app. no. 62740/00, 31 March 2005) Sabin Popescu v. Romania (app. no. 48102/99, 2 March 2004)
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Administrative Court, I U 1490/2019-92, ordinary, 22 June 2020, ECLI:SI:UPRS:2020:I.U.1490.2019.92

Deciding court: Administrative Court of Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Rule of law: Principle of legality (in particular, law making powers of the executive/law making procedures) Prevention of abuse of powers Prohibition of arbitrariness Fair Trial/Access to Justice   Trust: Rule of law challenges affecting cooperation and mutual trust under the Return Directive 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: M.S. S. v Belgium and Greece, app. no. 30696/09, 21 January 2011 Hirsi Jamaa v Italy, app. no. 27765/09, 23 February 2012  Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary, app. no. 47287/15, 21 November 2019 Čonka v. Belgium, app. no. 51564/99, 5 February 2002 M. A. v. Cyprus, app. no. 41872/10, 23 July 2013 M. A. and Others v. Lithuania, app. no.  59793/17, 11 December 2018 N.D. and N. T., app. nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15, 13 February 2020 Shioshvili and Others v. Russia, app. no. 19356/07, 20 December 2016 Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, app. no. 16643/09, 21 October 2014 Khlaifia and Others v. Italy, app. no. 16483/12, 15 December 2016.
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Constitutional court of the Republic of Slovenia), Up-472/20-23, constitutional, 14 February 2024

Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: European Convention on Human Rights, Articles 8, 10.ECtHR jurisprudence: Axel Springer AG v Germany of 7. 2. 2012 Piermont v France of 27. 4. 1995Jerusalem v Austria of 27. 2. 2001Lombardo and others v Malta of 24. 4. 2007Kubaszewski v Poland of 2. 2. 2010Otegi Mondragon v Spain of 15. 3. 2011Sanchez v France of 15. 5. 2023Féret v Belgium of 16. 7 .2009Lingens v Austria of 8.7. 1986Le Pen v France of 20. 4. 2010Khadija Ismayilova v Azerbajdžan of 7. 5. 2020Barata Monteiro de Costa Nogueira and Patricio Pereira v Portugal of 11. 1. 2011Handyside v the United Kingdom of 7. 12. 1976Sanocki v Poland of 17. 7. 2007Delfi AS v Estonia of 16. 6. 2015Oberschlick v Austria of 1. 7. 1997Bodrožić v Serbia of 23. 6. 2009Magyar Tartalomszolgáltatók Egyesülete in Index.hu Zrt v Hungary of 2. 2. 2016Gavrilovici v Moldavia of 15. 12. 2009Uj v Hungary of 19. 7. 2011Tuşalp v Turkey of 21. 2. 2012Otegi Mondragon v Spain of 15. 3. 2011Fuentes Bobo v Spain of 29. 2. 2000Savva Terentyev v Russia of 28. 8. 2018Lopes Gomes de Silva v Portugal of 28. 9. 2000Mesić v Croatia of 5. 5. 2022C8 (Canal8) v France of 9. 2. 2023
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Constitutional Court, Up-455/15, constitutional, 24 January 2019, ECLI:SI:USRS:2019:Up.455.15

Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Trust (limits in the dissatisfaction towards the judiciary, public confidence and authority of the judiciary) Freedom of expression of attorneys Impartiality (personal bias towards the party in the proceedings) Independence (professional ethics of the bar)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Oberschlick v. Austria, [GC] app. no. 11662/85, 23 May 1991 Animal Defenders International v. The United Kingdom, [GC] app. no. 48876/08, 22 April 2013, para. 100.   Uj v. Hunagary, app. no. 23954/10, 19 July 2011  Skałka v. Poland, app. no. 43425/98, 27 May 2003 Mamère v. France, app. no. 12697/03, 7 November 2006 Nikula v. Finland, app. no. 31611/96, 21 June 2002 Morice v. France, [GC] app. no. 29369/10, 23 April 2015 July and SARL Libération v. France, app. no. 20893/03, 14 February 2008 Kyprianou v. Cyprus, app. no. 73797/01, 15 December 2005 Čeferin v. Slovenia, app. no. 40975/08, 16 January 2018 Radobuljac v. Croatia, app. no. 51000/11, 28 June 2016
Total Row: 54 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy