Total Row: 137 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, Bucharest Court of Appeal, K.A.S. v. P.M, ordinary, Criminal Judgment no. 7/F of 17 January  2020, publication series (not applicable)
Deciding court: Bucharest Court of Appeal
Topic: Mutual Trust, Judicial Independence and Judicial Cooperation in Asylum
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 2, Article 3, Article 6 and Article 13 of the European Convention on Human RightsNo ECtHR judgments have been provided in the national decision.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Administrative Court, judgement and order I U 836/2023-7, ordinary, 20 June 2023, ECLI:SI:UPRS:2023:I.U.836.2023.7
Deciding court: Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: mutual trust, judicial independence, judicial cooperation
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Pending before the Supreme Court.
ECtHR jurisprudence: M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, App. no. 30696/09, 21 January 2011, para. 293Saadi v. Italy, Application No. 37201/06, 28 February 2008, para. 140J.K. v. and Others v. Sweden, Application No. 59166/12, 23 August 2016, paras. 83, 87, 90-92, 140F.G. v. Sweden, Application No. 43611/11, 23 March 2016, paras. 156M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece, Application No. 30696/09, 21 January 2011Tarakhel v. Switzerland, Application No. 29217/12, 4 November 2014Camara v. Belgium, Application No. 49255/22Msallem and 147 Others v. Belgium, Application No. 48987/22Al-Shuja and Others v. Belgium, Application No. 52208/22Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary, Application No. 47287/15, 21. November 2019, paras. 131, 133-134, 136-139, 141, 146-147, 149-150, 154, 162-163
TRIIAL CASE
Czech Republic, Ústavní soud (Constitutional Court), I. ÚS 1698/16, constitutional, 11. 1. 2017
Deciding court: Constitutional Court
Topic: Independence
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights
TRIIAL CASE
Italy, Court of Cassation, 19960, 30 January 2019
Deciding court: Court of Cassation
Topic: Independence, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Sąd Najwyższy (Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber), I NKRS 118/21, 12th January 2022, supreme
Deciding court: Supreme Court - Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber
Topic: independence, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, A. v. CIPC, supreme, Decision no. 695 of 7 November 2022, publication series (not applicable)
Deciding court: High Court of Cassation and Justice
Topic: Mutual Trust, Judicial Independence and Judicial Cooperation in Asylum
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 1, Article 5 and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human RightsNo ECtHR judgments have been provided in the national decision.
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, Bucharest Court of Appeal, AAAA v. BB, ordinary, Judgment no. 468 of 9 March 2022, publication series (not applicable)
Deciding court: Bucharest Court of Appeal
Topic: Mutual Trust, Judicial Independence and Judicial Cooperation in Asylum
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: No ECtHR judgments have been provided in the national decision.
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Budapest Administrative and Labour Court, 70.M.1051/2018/36, ordinary, 10 May 2019
Deciding court: Budapest Administrative and Labour Court
Topic: independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): No
ECtHR jurisprudence: No
TRIIAL CASE
Romania – Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) Case C-53/23 of 8 May 2024, ECLI:EU:C:2024:388 (request for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti (Court of Appeal Piteşti, Romania), made by decision of 31 January 2023, in the proceedings Asociația ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’, Asociația ‘Mișcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor’ v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: Rule of law, independence of the judiciary, Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania, Fight against corruption, Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system, Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations, Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow -up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: The ECHR jurisprudence was not referred to in this case.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court of Slovenia, Decision Up-919/23-20, constitutional, 23 November 2023, ECLI:SI:USRS:2019:U.I.152.17
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: mutual trust, judicial independence, accountability, Judicial cooperation in asylum
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Vilvarajah v The UK, 30. 10. 1991.Chahal v The UK, 15. 11. 1996.Soering v The UK, 7. 7. 1989.Jabari v Turkey, 11. 7. 2000.Bahaddar v The Netherlands, 19. 2. 1998.Salah Sheekh v The Netherlands, 11. 1. 2007.Ilias & Ahmed v Hungary, 21. 11. 2019.M. S. S. v Belgium and Greece, 21. 1. 2011.J. K. v Sweden, 23. 8. 2016.Tarakhel v Switzerland, 4. 11. 2014.Paposhvili v Belgium, 13. 12. 2016.Savran v Denmark, 7. 12. 2021.N. v Finland, 26. 7. 2005.
Total Row: 137 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy