Total Row: 155 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Budapest Court of Appeal), 2.Pf.20.619/2023/6, appellate, 12 December 2023
Deciding court: Budapest Court of Appeal
Topic: Rule of law, judicial independence
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Sąd Najwyższy - Professional Liability Chamber - Lieutenant Joanna T.
Deciding court: Supreme Court, Professional Liability Chamber. The chamber replaced in the Polish system the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court.
Topic: independence, impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): not applicable
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku, polish court case: VI P 6/23  CJEU C-146/23, ordinary
Deciding court: Regional Court in Białystok
Topic: Independence
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Sąd Najwyższy (Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber), I NKRS 118/21, 12th January 2022, supreme
Deciding court: Supreme Court - Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber
Topic: independence, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Italy, Court of Cassation, 19960, 30 January 2019
Deciding court: Court of Cassation
Topic: Independence, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Czech Republic, Ústavní soud (Constitutional Court), Pl. ÚS 39/08, constitutional, 6. 10. 2010
Deciding court: Constitutional Court
Topic: independence, impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Italy, Superior Council of the Judiciary, n. 52, disciplinary instance, 18 March 2018
Deciding court: Superior Council of the Judiciary 
Topic: Independence, accountability, impartiality (relationship between lawyers and judges, use of social media by judges, relations with the media) 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not a direct follow up 
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
European Court of Human Rights, Danoiu and others – app no 54780/15 and two others, Judgement of 25 January 2022, Fourth Section
Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights
Topic: mutual trust, independence, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The case  before the national courts is not the result of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art 1 Protocol 1 - ECHRECtHR, Scordino v Italia (nr. 1) (MC), app no. 36813/97, paras. 78, 2006ECtHR J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd și J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. Regatului Unit (MC), app no. 44302/02, paras. 52, 2007ECtHR Vistiđš și Perepjolkins v.Letonia (MC), app. no. 71243/01, paras. 93, 2012.ECtHR Radomilja and others v Croației (MC), app no. 37685/10 și 22768/12, paras. 149, 2018ECtHR Maurice v Franța (MC), app no. 11810/03, paras. 90-93, 2005ECtHR Capital Bank AD împotriva Bulgariei, nr. 49429/99, paras 135-140, 2005.
TRIIAL CASE
Czech Republic, Krajský soud v Brně (Regional Court in Brno), 31 A 68/2018-177, ordinary, 7. 11. 2018
Deciding court: Regional Court in Brno
Topic: independence, accountability, impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): No
ECtHR jurisprudence: ECtHR, A.H. v the United Kingdom, app. no. 3868/68
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Up-429/23-13, constitutional, 24 October 2024, ECLI:SI:USRS:2024:Up.429.23
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence, impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 6 ECHRFey v. Austria, App. no. 14396/88, 24 February 1993Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, Application no. 19874/92, 7 August 1996, para. 58Švarc and Kavnik v. Slovenia, Application no. 75617/01, 8 February 2007, para. 39Pullar v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 22399/93, 10 June 1996, para. 32Mitrinovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Application No. 6899/12, 30 April 2015, para. 36Parlov-Tkalčić v. Croatia, 22 December 2009.Daktaras v. Lithuania, 10 October 2000.Findlay v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997.Bochan v. Ukraine, 3 May 2007.Puolitaival and Pirttiaho v. Finland, 23 November 2004.Borgers v. Belgium, 30 October 1991.
Total Row: 155 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy