TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Kúria (Supreme Court of Hungary), Kvk.VII.39.089/2024/4., supreme, 21 May 2024
Deciding court: Supreme Court
Topic: Rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Budapest Court of Appeal), 2.Pf.20.619/2023/6, appellate, 12 December 2023
Deciding court: Budapest Court of Appeal
Topic: Rule of law, judicial independence
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
European Court of Human Rights Mateut v. Romania – app. nr. 35959/15, decision of 1 March 2022, Fourth Section
Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights
Topic: mutual trust, accountability, rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 8, art 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental FreedomsEtCHR Pruteanu v Romania, app no 30181/05, 2015EtCHR Bourdov c Rusia, app no 59498/00, 2002EtCHR Centro Europa 7 S.RL. et Di Stefano c. Italie [GC], no 38433/09, 2012EtCHR Scordino c. Italie (no1) [GC], no 36813/97, 2006EtCHR Ben Faiza c. France, no 31446/12, 2018EtCHR Mucea c Romania, app no 24591/07, 2016 EtCHR Vasil Vasilev c. Bulgarie, no 7610/15, 2021
TRIIAL CASE
Romania – Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) Case C-53/23 of 8 May 2024, ECLI:EU:C:2024:388 (request for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti (Court of Appeal Piteşti, Romania), made by decision of 31 January 2023, in the proceedings Asociația ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’, Asociația ‘Mișcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor’ v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic: Rule of law, independence of the judiciary, Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania, Fight against corruption, Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system, Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations, Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow -up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.
ECtHR jurisprudence: The ECHR jurisprudence was not referred to in this case.
TRIIAL CASE
Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), C-107/23 PPU (Effect of the decisions of a constitutional court), ECLI:EU:C:2023:606, in connection with Romanian Constitutional Court, Decision no. 297/26 April 2018, Decision no. 358/26 May 2022, Decision no. 67/2022 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union / Romanian Constitutional Court
Topic: Rule of law, independence of the judiciary
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The Judgment of the Court in the Case C-107/23 PPU represents the response to the request made by a national ordinary court, Curtea de Apel Brasov (Court of Appeal, Brasov, Romania) as follow-up of the Decision no. 297/26.04.2018 and Decision no. 358/26.05.2022 of the Romanian Constitutional Court and Decision no. 67/2022 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania, which clarify the way it should be judged a national case as regards the criminal limitation period for criminal liability especially in criminal cases of crimes against financial interest of European Union
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, European Court of Human Rights, M.D. and Others v. Hungary, no. 60778/19, 19 September 2024
Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights
Topic: mutual trust, rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC]M.A. v. Belgium M.K. and Others v. PolandN.D. and N.T. v. Spain [GC]Shahzad v. HungaryMoustahi v. FranceGeorgia v. RussiaČonka v. BelgiumHirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC]Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC]
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, European Court of Human Rights, no. 36037/17, R.R. and Others v. Hungary, 2 March 2021
Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights
Topic: rule of law
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Ilias and Ahmed v. HungaryKhlaifia and Others v. ItalyPopov v. FranceS.F. and Others v. BulgariaA.B. and Others v. FranceMüslim v. TurkeyM.S.S. v. Belgium and GreeceBudina v. Russia Muskhadzhiyeva and Others v. BelgiumAden Ahmed v. MaltaZ.A. and Others v. RussiaPaladi v. MoldovaKamil Uzun v. Turkey
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Alkotmánybíróság (Constitutional Court), 3070/2022. (II. 25.), constitutional, 8 February 2022
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of Hungary
Topic: rule of law, independence
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (reference only by the applicants)Miracle Europe Kft v. Hungary, no. 57774/13, 12 January 2016; DMD Group, a. s. v Slovakia, no. 19334/03, 5 October 2010 (references only by the applicants)
TRIIAL CASE
Italy, Tribunal of Milan, FR v. Ministero dell’Interno, ordinary instance, 9/5/2018
Deciding court: Tribunal of Milan
Topic: Impartiality (Conflict of Interest)Rule of law (Fair Trial/ Access to Justice)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is a direct follow up of the CJEU order of 27 September 2018
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 3 ECHRArticle 6 ECHRArticle 13 ECHRECtHR judgments:Gebremedhin v. France of 26 April 2007Hirsi Jamaa v. Italy of 23 February 2012Krombach v. France of 13 February 2001Annoni v. France of 14 November 2000
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Kúria (Supreme Court of Hungary), Pfv.IV.21.019/2022/4., supreme, 8 March 2023
Deciding court: Supreme Court
Topic: rule of law, independence, impartiality, accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy