CJC Database

TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Gdańsk Court of Appeal, II Aka 261/22 appelate, 27th September 2022

Deciding court: Gdańsk Court of Appeal

Topic: Mutual Trust

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): (Indirect) follow up of C-221/19

ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A

TRIIAL CASE

Ireland, CJEU, C-216/18 PPU, 25.07.2018,

Deciding court: Court of Justice of European Union

Topic: Mutual trust

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO

ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A

TRIIAL CASE

Italy, District Court of Florence, XXX.XX, ordinary instance, 29/04/2021, reference for a preliminary ruling. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2023 (Joined Cases C‑228/21, C‑254/21, C‑297/21, C‑315/21 and C‑328/21)

Deciding court: District Court of Florence - Section for international protection

Topic: Mutual trust

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national decision originated the case C-297/21. The CJEU issued judgment on joined cases C-228/21, C-254/21, C-297/21, C-315/21, C-328/21 on 30 November 2023.

ECtHR jurisprudence: The national decision directly refers to the ECHR, Article 3 (Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment).The national decision directly refers to the following judgments of the ECtHR (chronological order): M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, 21 January 2011, App. No 30696/09, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0121JUD003069609; Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, 23 February 2012, App. No. 27765/09, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0223JUD002776509; Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, 21 October 2014, App. No 16643/09, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021JUD001664309.

TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Supreme Administrative Court), case number II OSK 382/20, appellate instance, 11 January 2022

Deciding court: Supreme Administrative Court in Poland

Topic: mutual trust and impartiality

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): This national case is not a direct follow-up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.

ECtHR jurisprudence: In the case under consideration, ECtHR jurisprudence was referred to indirectly by invoking the protection of fundamental rights, particularly through:Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which prohibits inhuman or degrading treatment. This was referenced in relation to the risk of mistreatment upon the transfer of the applicant under the Dublin III Regulation.Article 8 of the ECHR was indirectly invoked concerning the right to respect for family life, which is relevant in assessing whether the transfer under the Dublin III Regulation could lead to a violation of family unity, given the applicant's marriage to a Polish national.In particular, the B.S. v. Spain and Tarakhel v. Switzerland cases are often cited in similar situations concerning the risk of human rights violations in the context of the Dublin transfers. However, the decision did not explicitly mention these cases, focusing more on the CJEU case law.

TRIIAL CASE

European Court of Human Rights, Danoiu and others – app no 54780/15 and two others, Judgement of 25 January 2022, Fourth Section

Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights

Topic: mutual trust, independence, accountability

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The case before the national courts is not the result of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.

ECtHR jurisprudence: Art 1 Protocol 1 - ECHRECtHR, Scordino v Italia (nr. 1) (MC), app no. 36813/97, paras. 78, 2006ECtHR J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd și J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. Regatului Unit (MC), app no. 44302/02, paras. 52, 2007ECtHR Vistiđš și Perepjolkins v.Letonia (MC), app. no. 71243/01, paras. 93, 2012.ECtHR Radomilja and others v Croației (MC), app no. 37685/10 și 22768/12, paras. 149, 2018ECtHR Maurice v Franța (MC), app no. 11810/03, paras. 90-93, 2005ECtHR Capital Bank AD împotriva Bulgariei, nr. 49429/99, paras 135-140, 2005.

TRIIAL CASE

European Court of Human Rights Mateut v. Romania – app. nr. 35959/15, decision of 1 March 2022, Fourth Section

Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights

Topic: mutual trust, accountability, rule of law

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.

ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 8, art 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental FreedomsEtCHR Pruteanu v Romania, app no 30181/05, 2015EtCHR Bourdov c Rusia, app no 59498/00, 2002EtCHR Centro Europa 7 S.RL. et Di Stefano c. Italie [GC], no 38433/09, 2012EtCHR Scordino c. Italie (no1) [GC], no 36813/97, 2006EtCHR Ben Faiza c. France, no 31446/12, 2018EtCHR Mucea c Romania, app no 24591/07, 2016 EtCHR Vasil Vasilev c. Bulgarie, no 7610/15, 2021

TRIIAL CASE

Poland, Regional Court in Hajnówka, ordinary, pending case on helping migrants on the border

Deciding court: Regional Court in Hajnówka

Topic: mutual trust

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): In a way - see case R.A. v. Poland available in the CJC database.

ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A

TRIIAL CASE

Romania, The European Court of Human Rights, Fernandes de Araújo v. Romania, application no. 10772/21; Judgment of 16 April 2024

Deciding court: The European Court of Human Rights

Topic: Mutual trust

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights● ECHR, Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, Judgment of 25 January 2000, 31679/96;● ECHR, Shaw v. Hungary, Judgment of 26 July 2011, 6457/09;● ECHR, Strumia v. Italy, Judgment of 23 June 2016, 53377/13;● ECHR, I.M. and Others v. Italy, Judgment of 10 November 2022, 25426/20.

TRIIAL CASE

Italy, Court of Palermo, Section for immigration, international protection and free movement of citizens of the European Union, ordinary instance, Decree of 27 August 2024

Deciding court: Court of Palermo

Topic: Mutual trust

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A

TRIIAL CASE

Italy, Court of Catania (Tribunale di Catania), no. 4117/2023, immigration section, ordinary instance, Decree of 29 September 2023

Deciding court: Court of Catania

Topic: Mutual trust

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A