Total Row: 12 / View:
Page:

Disapplication


This technique is probably the one that implies the highest degree of interference of supranational/international law in the domestic legal orders of the Member States, as it requires national judges to set aside a domestic norm conflicting with EU law, the ECtHR or international law. Thus, it presupposes an assessment of incompatibility between the national provision and the relevant supranational/international norm. The determined incompatibility of a national norm with the European level norm that could lead to disapplication of a national norm does not render the latter provision void. It merely precludes its application in specific cases. The implications of disapplication on the life of the disapplied domestic provision is not regulated by international/supranational law, which rather leaves this issue to be dealt with under national law.
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Benkharbouche v Sudan and Janah v Libya Court of Appeal, 5 February 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Sanchez Marcello I & Sanchez Marcello II, Judgments of 17 July 2014, 16 July 2015
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Aziz, Judgement of 14 March 2013
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Sanchez Morcillo, judgement of 4 April 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Internal - Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Greece, Council of State, case number 1113/2014, Judgement of March 20th 2014
Conflict: Conflict of rights
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Internal
Categories: Greece - National Courts - Supreme Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, C-83/14, CHEZ, Judgment of 16 July 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Race
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Appeal Court of Rome (labour sect.) RG 1044/13, 15 April 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Disapplication
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Age
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Tribunal of Milan 7 January 2005 and Court of Appeal of Firenze, 27 March 2006
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Disapplication
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Italy - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Age
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Targu Mures, Sindicatul Liber, Judgement of 03 June 2009
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type: External - Supra-national level - Internal - Vertical interaction
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 17 - Right to property - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Protocol 12 Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Constanta, Radu, Judgement of 11 March 2013, European Arrest Warrant
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
Total Row: 12 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy