JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Înalta Curte de Casa?ie ?i Justi?ie, (High Court of Cassation and Justice), Case no. 3306/1/2015, Decision no. 37 of 7 December 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland,Supreme Court, Minister for Justice & Equality v Ostrowski [2013] IESC 24, appellate, 15 May 2013, [2013] 5 JIC 1501
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Deferential approach - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External
Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Tallinn Circuit Court, Case no. 3-15-2379, Judgement of 23 December 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Cluj, Judgement of May 31st 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of rights
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Protocol 12 Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Upper Tribunal, ZAT and others case, judgement of
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, High Court, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al v British Telecommunications
Conflict:
Conflict of rights - Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - National level - Internal - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Constanta, Radu, Judgement of 11 March 2013, European Arrest Warrant
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Bucharest, NGO ACCEPT v the National Council for Combating Discrimination
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Ordinary Court - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Sexual orientation
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy