Total Row: 16 / View:
Page:
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Alassini et al., Judgement of 18 March 2010
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
Spain, Constitutional Court, Melloni, STC 26/2014, 13 February 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland, Supreme Court, Dundon v Governor of Cloverhill Prison [2005] IESC 83, [2006] 1 IR 518, 19 December 2005
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Czech Republic, Constitutional Court, case no ÚS 860/15
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Czech Republic - Constitutional Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Supreme Court, case no 3-3-1-32-15, Judgement of 15 September 2015
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Riigikohus Supreme Court, Case no 3-3-1-14-16, Judgement of 3 March 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
France, Council of State, Halifa, No. 370515, 4 June 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Internal - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 41 - Right to good administration
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Tallinn Circuit Court, Case no. 3-15-2379, Judgement of 23 December 2015
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Supreme Court, Case no. 3-3-1-11-16, Judgement of 22 March 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - National level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
Total Row: 16 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy