JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione), Section VI civil, 25 March 2015, Ordinance No. 5926
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Equivalent protection
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Boudjlida, Judgment of 11 December 2014
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 41 - Right to good administration
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, High Court, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al v British Telecommunications
Conflict:
Conflict of rights - Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - National level - Internal - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
The Netherlands, Judicial division of the Council of State, 201208550/1/V2, supreme, Judgement of 8 July 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
The Netherlands, Court of first instance of the Hague, Middelburg branch, Judgment of 11 August 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Spill-over dimension
Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 10 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Targu Mures, Sindicatul Liber, Judgement of 03 June 2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
External - Supra-national level - Internal - Vertical interaction
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 17 - Right to property - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Protocol 12 Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Arslan, Judgement of 30 May 2013
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Czech Republic - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Germany, Supreme Administrative Court, Judgment of 31 March 2011
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Categories: Germany - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum
JUDCOOP CASE
Germany, Supreme Administrative Court, Judgment of 31 March 2011
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Categories: Germany - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Tribunal of Pavia, Manara v. INPS, Order of 9 September 2009
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interaction between provisions - Disapplication
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Disability
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy