JUDCOOP CASE
Austria, Austrian Constitutional Court, Case B166/2013, 13 March 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - National level
Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles
JUDCOOP CASE
CJEU, Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, Case C-73/07
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Finland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Slovakia, Constitutional Court II. ÚS 152/08, 15 December 2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Slovakia - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Portugal, Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) - Case 403/2015, 27 August 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Portugal - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Curtea Constitu?ional? a României (Romanian Constitutional Court), 424 D/2014 & 478/D/2014, 8 july 2014
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland, Graham Dwyer v. Data Commissioner, The High Court, n. 351/2015, 6 December 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level
Categories: Ireland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Court of Padua, n. 709/2018, 24 December 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Portugal, Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) - Case 333/2018, 27 June 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External
Categories: Portugal - Constitutional Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Benkharbouche v Sudan and Janah v Libya Court of Appeal, 5 February 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Jeremy F., judgment of 30 May 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy