Total Row: 19 / View:
Page:
JUDCOOP CASE
Austria, Austrian Constitutional Court, Case B166/2013, 13 March 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level
Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles
JUDCOOP CASE
CJEU, Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, Case C-73/07
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Finland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 3216/2014, 19 november 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Tribunal of Rovereto, 19 November 2015
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 359/2014 of 28 January 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Slovakia, Constitutional Court II. ÚS 152/08, 15 December 2009
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Slovakia - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Greece, Council of State, Case 1901/2014 (Supreme Administrative Court)
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Greece - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 51 - Field of application
JUDCOOP CASE
Spain, Constitutional Court, nº 177/2015, 22 July 2015
Conflict: Conflict of rights
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Belgium, Constitutional Court, n°31/2018, March, 15th 2018
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Belgium - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Spain, Tribunal Constitucional, Constitutional Court, nº 58/2018, constitutional, 4 June 2018
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information
Total Row: 19 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy