JUDCOOP CASE
Austria, Austrian Constitutional Court, Case B166/2013, 13 March 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - National level
Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles
JUDCOOP CASE
Spain, Constitutional Court, nº 177/2015, 22 July 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of rights
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Belgium, Constitutional Court, n°31/2018, March, 15th 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Belgium - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Spain, Tribunal Constitucional, Constitutional Court, nº 58/2018, constitutional, 4 June 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information
JUDCOOP CASE
Portugal, Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) - Case 403/2015, 27 August 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Portugal - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Curtea Constitu?ional? a României (Romanian Constitutional Court), 424 D/2014 & 478/D/2014, 8 july 2014
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Înalta Curte de Casa?ie ?i Justi?ie, (High Court of Cassation and Justice), Case no. 3306/1/2015, Decision no. 37 of 7 December 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Portugal, Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court), 241/2002, 29 May 2002
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Portugal - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Înalta Curte de Casa?ie ?i Justi?ie, (High Court of Cassation and Justice), Case no. 3306/1/2015, Decision no. 37 of 7 December 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - National level
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Portugal, Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) - Case 333/2018, 27 June 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External
Categories: Portugal - Constitutional Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy