JUDCOOP CASE
CJEU, Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, Case C-73/07
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Finland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Tribunal of Rovereto, 19 November 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
CJEU, Mesopotamia Broadcast A/S METV (C-244/10) and Roj TV A/S (C-245/10) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Portugal, Tribunal Central Administrativo do Sul (Central Administrative Court of the South) - 2937/16.6BELSB
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Portugal - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Curtea de Appel Cluj, (Court of Appeal Cluj), 740/33/2013, Smaranda Bara and Others v. Casa Na?ional? de Asigur?ri de S?n?tate and Others, appellate, 14.12.2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Bucharest County Court - 29152/3/2007, B?rbulescu Bogdan Mihai v. S.C. Secpral Pro Instala?ii S.R.L., ordinary, 07.12.2007
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Court of Padua, n. 709/2018, 24 December 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Benkharbouche v Sudan and Janah v Libya Court of Appeal, 5 February 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal
Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Scania and Blekinge Court of Appeal, B985-12, decision 11 April 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy