JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Boudjlida, Judgment of 11 December 2014
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 41 - Right to good administration
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Court of Appeal, R (AR) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Judgement of 28 June 2013
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 41 - Right to good administration
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland, The High Court, Smith v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Judgement of 5 March 2012
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between provisions - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland, High Court, F.O. v Refugees Appeals Tribunal & anor, [2014] IEHC 123
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Upper Tribunal, ZAT and others case, judgement of
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, The Supreme Court, R (on the application of EM, EH, AE and MA v Secretary of State for the Home Department), Judgement of 19 February 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, High Court, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al v British Telecommunications
Conflict:
Conflict of rights - Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - National level - Internal - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
The Netherlands, Judicial division of the Council of State, 201208550/1/V2, supreme, Judgement of 8 July 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
The Netherlands, Court of first instance of the Hague, Middelburg branch, Judgment of 11 August 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Spill-over dimension
Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 10 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Targu Mures, Sindicatul Liber, Judgement of 03 June 2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
External - Supra-national level - Internal - Vertical interaction
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 17 - Right to property - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Protocol 12 Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy