Total Row: 17 / View:
Page:
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, A v. B and Others, judgment of 11 September 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Jeremy F., judgment of 30 May 2013
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Radu, judgment of 29 January 2013
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Aranyosi and C?ld?raru, judgment of 5 April 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning I, NJA 2013 s 502, decision 11 June 2013
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning, INJA 2013 s 502, Decision of 11 June 2013
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Scania and Blekinge Court of Appeal, B985-12, decision 11 April 2013
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Gothenburg District Court, B 2683-09, Decision 25 January 2011
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Solna District Court, Decision of 3 May 2016, B 2768-16
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
Total Row: 17 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy