JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
Spain, Constitutional Court, Melloni, STC 26/2014, 13 February 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Decision of November 30 2016, case Ö 5052-16
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland, Supreme Court, Dundon v Governor of Cloverhill Prison [2005] IESC 83, [2006] 1 IR 518, 19 December 2005
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Case C?601/15 PPU J.N, Judgement of 15 February 2016
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External
Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Supreme Court, case no 3-3-1-32-15, Judgement of 15 September 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Riigikohus Supreme Court, Case no 3-3-1-14-16, Judgement of 3 March 2016
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Tallinn Circuit Court, Case no. 3-15-2379, Judgement of 23 December 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Arslan, Judgement of 30 May 2013
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Czech Republic - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy