JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, C?429/15, Danqua, Judgement of 20 October 2016
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ireland - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Supreme Court of Cassation, Iyan v Minister for Internal Affairs and Ors,
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Italy - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia, Case no. I Kz 52/14-6, Judgement of 17 February 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Croatia - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Germany, Supreme Administrative Court, Judgment of 31 March 2011
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Categories: Germany - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum
JUDCOOP CASE
Germany, Supreme Administrative Court, Judgment of 31 March 2011
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Categories: Germany - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy