JUDCOOP CASE
Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, 48/12.2YREVR.S1, 5 June 2012
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - Internal
Categories: Portugal - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning I, NJA 2013 s 502, decision 11 June 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning, INJA 2013 s 502, Decision of 11 June 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Scania and Blekinge Court of Appeal, B985-12, decision 11 April 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Gothenburg District Court, B 2683-09, Decision 25 January 2011
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy