JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, Judgement of 19 September 2012, N. 5473/2/2012
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Tallinn Circuit Court, Case no. 3-15-2379, Judgement of 23 December 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Arslan, Judgement of 30 May 2013
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Czech Republic - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Constanta, Radu, Judgement of 11 March 2013, European Arrest Warrant
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
France, Conseil Constitutionnel, Jeremy F. v. Premier ministre
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Mutual recognition
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Criminal law - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy