JUDCOOP CASE
CJEU, Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, Case C-73/07
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Finland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 3216/2014, 19 november 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Tribunal of Rovereto, 19 November 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 359/2014 of 28 January 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Slovakia, Constitutional Court II. ÚS 152/08, 15 December 2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Slovakia - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Spain, Constitutional Court, nº 177/2015, 22 July 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of rights
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Belgium, Constitutional Court, n°31/2018, March, 15th 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Belgium - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, First instance court Milan, decision 13716/15, 17 December 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of rights
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Internal - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
CJEU, Mesopotamia Broadcast A/S METV (C-244/10) and Roj TV A/S (C-245/10) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Curtea Constitu?ional? a României (Romanian Constitutional Court), 424 D/2014 & 478/D/2014, 8 july 2014
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy