Total Row: 9 / View:
Page:
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Melloni, judgment of 26 February 2013
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal
Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Abdoulaye Amadou Tall, judgement of 17 December 2015
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, ZZ, judgment of 4 June 2013
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, LZ, Judgment of 8 November 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Slovakia - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Case Orizzonte Salute, judgment of 6 October 2015
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Alassini et al., Judgement of 18 March 2010
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Supreme Court, Case no. 3-3-1-11-16, Judgement of 22 March 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - National level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
JUDCOOP CASE
France, Conseil Constitutionnel, Jeremy F. v. Premier ministre
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Mutual recognition
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Criminal law - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
Total Row: 9 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy