JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 3216/2014, 19 november 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 359/2014 of 28 January 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Curtea Constitu?ional? a României (Romanian Constitutional Court), 424 D/2014 & 478/D/2014, 8 july 2014
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Curtea de Appel Cluj, (Court of Appeal Cluj), 740/33/2013, Smaranda Bara and Others v. Casa Na?ional? de Asigur?ri de S?n?tate and Others, appellate, 14.12.2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Înalta Curte de Casa?ie ?i Justi?ie, (High Court of Cassation and Justice), Case no. 3306/1/2015, Decision no. 37 of 7 December 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Înalta Curte de Casa?ie ?i Justi?ie, (High Court of Justice and Cassation) - Decision no. 1059 of 16 June 2017
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Bucharest County Court - 29152/3/2007, B?rbulescu Bogdan Mihai v. S.C. Secpral Pro Instala?ii S.R.L., ordinary, 07.12.2007
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Înalta Curte de Casa?ie ?i Justi?ie, (High Court of Cassation and Justice), Case no. 3306/1/2015, Decision no. 37 of 7 December 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - National level
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Radu, judgment of 29 January 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy