JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning I, NJA 2013 s 502, decision 11 June 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning, INJA 2013 s 502, Decision of 11 June 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Scania and Blekinge Court of Appeal, B985-12, decision 11 April 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Gothenburg District Court, B 2683-09, Decision 25 January 2011
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Solna District Court, Decision of 3 May 2016, B 2768-16
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Decision of November 30 2016, case Ö 5052-16
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy