Deciding court: Constitutional Court

Topic: Fundamental Rights

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

Deciding court: The Administrative Body for Contractual Resources of the Autonomous Community of Euskadi

Topic: Fundamental rights

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO

Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union

Topic: CJUE jurisdiction

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO

Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union

Topic: Independence and accountability of the judiciary

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

Deciding court: Supreme Court - Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber

Topic: independence, accountability

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A

Deciding court: Budapest Administrative and Labour Court

Topic: independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): No

Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union

Topic: Independence and accountability of the judiciary

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The Judgment of the Court in case C- 58/22 represents the response to the request made by a national ordinary court, Court of Appeal, Craiova, as follow-up of a judgment in a criminal matter, issued by the High Court of Cassation and Justice, Romania, within an cassation appeal. By this Decision, the High Court of Cassation and Justice found that the that Court of Appeal Craiova wrongfully applied the principle ne bis in idem.  In the context of reconsideration of its decision, the referring court raised a question of the interpretation to be given to the principle ne bis in idem, within the meaning of Article 50 of the Charter, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings.

Deciding court: Supreme Court of Justice

Topic: Preliminary ruling procedure; accountability

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Ferreira da Silva e Brito (ECLI:EU:C:2015:565)

Deciding court: Supreme Court

Topic: impartiality

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): NO

Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union

Topic: Rule of law, independence of the judiciary, Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania, Fight against corruption, Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system, Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations, Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings

National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is not the direct follow -up of a CJEU or ECtHR decision.