Total Row: 231 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Higher Court of Ljubljana, I Kp 34149/2022, appellate, 16 February 2023, ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2023:I.KP.34149.2022
Deciding court: Higher Court of Ljubljana
Topic: mutual trust
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), Article 3.Muršić v. Croatia, 20. Oktober 2016.Torreggianni and Others v. Italy, 8. January 2013
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, District Court of Nova Gorica, I Kpd 30101/2020-18, ordinary, 4 September 2020
Deciding court: District Court of Nova Gorica
Topic: Mutual trust
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), C-396/11 Ciprian Vasile Radu (European arrest warrant and surrender procedures between Member States), ECLI:EU:C:2013:39, in connection with Curtea de Apel Constanţa (Court of Appeal, Constanța, Romania), request for a preliminary ruling made by decision of 18 May 2011, received at the Court on 27 July 2011
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union/Court of Appeal Constanta
Topic: Mutual trust
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The Judgment of the Court in case C-396/11 Ciprian Vasile Radu represents the response to the request made by a national ordinary court, Curtea de Apel Constanța (Court of Appeal, Constanța, Romania). Law no. 300 of November 15, 2013, published in Official Gazette of Romania no. 772 of 11 December 2013 provides multiple changes of the European arrest warrant: issuing authority and procedure, transmission for execution and translation of the European arrest warrant; additional information and guarantees; temporary surrender or hearing of the requested person during the European Arrest Warrant surrender procedure; refusal of surrender; procedure on arrest of the requested person – hearing of the requested person; postponed surrender.Decision of the Constitutional Court no. 712 of December 4, 2014, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 33 of January 15, 2015 qualified as unconstitutional Articles 211-217 of Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, articles relevant for the application of Article 104 of the Law no. 302 of 2004 on judicial cooperation in criminal matters: “If the requested person is set at liberty, the court orders against him the measure of judicial control, judicial control on bail or house arrest, the provisions of Art. 211-222 of the Criminal Procedure Code) applying accordingly. In this case, in the situation where, subsequently, the court orders the execution of the European arrest warrant, through the surrender decision, the arrest of the requested person is also ordered to surrender to the issuing judicial authority.”
ECtHR jurisprudence: Articles 5 and 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (indicated in the request for a preliminary ruling)Chahal v. United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 112, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, Ismoilov v. Russia, no. 2947/06, § 135, 24 April 2008, and Lokpo and Toure v. Hungary, no. 10816/10, § 16, 20 September 2011, A. and Others v. United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, § 164, ECHR 2009, Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201/06, §§ 128 and 129. Bernard v. France, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, joint partly dissenting opinion of Judges Bratza, Bonello and Hedigan in the Court of Human Rights judgment in Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey, nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 14; Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom, nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3096/10, § 89
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C-305/22, Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 6 May 2022 – criminal proceedings against C.J.
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union / Court of Appeal Bucharest
Topic: Mutual trust
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Romania, Court of Justice of the European Union (Second Chamber), C‑241/15 Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi (European arrest warrant; Obligation to include in the European arrest warrant information concerning the existence of an ‘arrest warrant’), ECLI:EU:C:2016:385, in connection with request for a preliminary ruling Curtea de Apel Cluj (Court of Appeal, Cluj, Romania), made by decision of 22 May 2015, received at the Court on 25 May 2015
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union/ Court of Appeal Cluj
Topic: Mutual trust
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The Judgment of the Court in the Case C‑241/15 Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi represents the response to the request made by a national ordinary court, Curtea de Apel Cluj (Court of Appeal, Constanța, Romania).Law no. 236 of December 5, 2017, Published in the Official Gazette no. 993 of December 14, 2017 provides multiple changes, including procedure of European arrest warrant and access to a lawyer in both states.
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Supreme court of the Republic of Slovenia, judgment XI Ips 38913/19, supreme, 18 October 2019, ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:XI.IPS.38913.2019.1
Deciding court: Supreme court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: mutual trust
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Lisbon Court of Appeal, 3604/22.7YRLSB-3, Appellate, 11.01.2023.
Deciding court: Lisbon Court of Appeal
Topic: Judicial independence; Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 6 of the ECHR.
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, 27/16.0GEMMN.E1-A.S1, Supreme, 08.06.2022.
Deciding court: Supreme Court of Justice
Topic: Judicial independence; Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Articles 6 and 10 of the ECHR. Piersack v. Belgium, (8692/79); Cubber v. Belgium (9186/80); Borgers v. Belgium (12005/86); Micallef v. Malta (17056/06).
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, 24/14.0TELSB-FK.L1-A.S1, Supreme, 26.01.2022.
Deciding court: Supreme Court of Justice
Topic: Judicial independence; Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 10 of the ECHR.
TRIIAL CASE
Czech Republic, Nejvyšší správní soud (Supreme Administrative Court), 8 Azs 114/2021-46, supreme, 8. 12. 2021
Deciding court: Supreme Administrative Court
Topic: Mutual trust
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Decision of the ECtHR from 8. 11. 2021, Dolińska-ficek and Ozimek v Poland, applications no. 49868/19 a 57511/19Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 7. 2021, Reczkowicz v Poland, application no. 43447/19Decision of the ECtHR from 29. 6. 2021, Broda and Bojara v Poland, applications no. 26691/18 a 27367/18Decision of the ECtHR from 7. 5. 2021, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v Poland, application no. 4907/18
Total Row: 231 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy