Total Row: 34 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE

Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal, European Court of Human Rights, 6 November 2018

Deciding court: European Court of Human Rights 
Topic: Accountability and independence 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Baka v. Hungary, 27 May 2014; Denison v. Ukraine, 25 September 2018. 
TRIIAL CASE

Portugal, Southern Central Administrative Court, Decision of 12 February 2015

Deciding court: Southern Central Administrative Court
Topic: Accountability, efficiency of the justice system
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable. 
ECtHR jurisprudence: Not applicable. 
TRIIAL CASE

Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, Decision of 21st March 2013

Deciding court: Supreme Court of Justice 
Topic: Accountability, Organization of the Judiciary; Council of the Judiciary; disciplinary, civil and criminal liability of magistrates (judges and prosecutors).
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable.  
ECtHR jurisprudence: Not applicable.  
TRIIAL CASE
Deciding court: Not applicable.
Topic: Accountability, councils of the Judiciary/Courts’ Presidents and Chief Prosecutors’ Role
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable.
ECtHR jurisprudence: Not applicable.
TRIIAL CASE

Portugal, Social media and the Rui Pinto case, 2020

Deciding court: Not applicable.  
Topic: Accountability, the use of social media
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable.  
ECtHR jurisprudence: Not applicable.  
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Administrative Court, I U 1478/2016-19, ordinary, 30 August 2017, ECLI:SI:UPRS:2017:I.U.1478.2016.19

Deciding court: Administrative Court of Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence (removal of magistrates, legal remedies for individual judges against dismissal decisions), accountability (Councils of the judiciary)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland (app. no. 632335/00, Grand Chamber, 19 April 2007) Oleksander Volkov v. Ukraine (app. no. 21722/11, 9 January 2013) Baka v. Hungary (app. no. 20261/12, Grand Chamber, 23 June 2016) G v. Finland (app. no. 33173/05, 27 January 2009) Harabin v. Slovakia (app. no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012) Olujić v. Croatia (app. no. 22330/05, 5 February 2005) Mitrinovski v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (app. no. 6899/12, 30 April 2015) Parlov-Tkalčič v. Croatia (app. no. 24810/06, 22 December 2009) Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland (app. no. 23614/0830 November 2010  Maktouf and Damjanović v. BiH (app. nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, Grand Chamber, 18 July 2013) Paluda v. Slovakia, (app. no. 33392/12, 23 May 2017) Saghatelyan v. Armenia, (app. no. 7984/06, 20 October 2015) Poposki and Duma v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (app. nos. 69916/10 and 36531/11,  7 January 2016) Jakšovski and Trifunovski v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, (app nos. 5681/09 and 58738/09, 7 January 2016) Moiseyev v. Russia (app. no. 62936, 9 October 2008) Agrokompleks v. Ukraine (app. no.23465/03, 6 October 2011) Scordino v. Italy, (no.1) (app. no. 36813/97, 29 March 2006, Grand Chamber) Hirschhorn v. Romania (app. no. 29294/02, 26 July 2007) Hornsby v. Greece (app. no. 18357/91, 19 March 1997) Kyrtatos v. Greece (app. no. 41666/98, 22 May 2003) Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy (app. no. 22774/93, 28 July 1999) Matheus c. France (app. no. 62740/00, 31 March 2005) Sabin Popescu v. Romania (app. no. 48102/99, 2 March 2004)
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Constitutional Court, U-I-246/19-11, constitutional, 24 October 2019, ECLI:SI:USRS:2021:U.I.246.19; Constitutional Court, U-I-214/19-17, Up-1011/19-52, constitutional, 8 July 2021, ECLI:SI:USRS:2021:U.I.214.19

Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Accountability Independence (interference by the legislative branch),  Rule of law (prevention of abuse of powers) 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Venice Commission Study no. 759/2014 of 25 March 2014: Amicus Curiae Brief in the case of Rywin v. Poland, paras. 6, 17, 31.  Kövesi v. Romania, 5 May 2020
TRIIAL CASE

Portugal, Porto Court of Appeal, Decision of 13th March 2013

Deciding court: Porto Court Appeal 
Topic: Accountability; personal data.
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable.  
ECtHR jurisprudence: Not applicable.  
TRIIAL CASE

 Paris Court of Appeal, S.N.F. S.A.S v La Chambre de Commerce Internationale

Deciding court: Paris Court of Appeal
Topic: Accountability/civiliability of arbitral institutions
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Constitutional Court, Up-709/15-29, Up-710/15-34, constitutional, 9 October 2019, ECLI:SI:USRS:2019:Up.709.15

Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Accountability (individual judges’ liability), impartiality (corruption), rule of law (fight against serious crime)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Figueiredo Teixeira v. Andorra, app. no. 72384/14, 8 November 2016 Ben Faiza v. France, app. no. 31446/12, 8 February 2018 Benedik v. Slovenia, app. no. 62357/14, 24 April 2018
Total Row: 34 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy