Total Row: 41 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Su 12/2023-13, instance: ordinary, 11 May 2023
Deciding court: Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic:  Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Su 293/2022, instance: ordinary, 27 October 2022
Deciding court: Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, The Ethics and Integrity Commission, Decision of 29 November 2016 - Public expression of a judge in interviews, instance: ordinary, 29 November 2016
Deciding court: Ethics and Integrity Commission of the Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic:  Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: European Convention on Human Rights, Article 10.Baka v. Hungary (GC), app. no. 20261/12, 23 June 2016
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Fővárosi Ítélőtábla Mellett Működő Elsőfokú Szolgálati Bíróság (First Instance Service Court attached to the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal), SZF1/46/2011 - Ravasz case, ordinary, 23 January 2012
Deciding court: First Instance Service Court attached to the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal
Topic: independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court, U-I-445/18, 14 October 2021, ECLI:SI:USRS:2021:U.I.445.18
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence (removal of magistrates, legal remedies for individual judges against dismissal decisions), accountability (Councils of the judiciary)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): VSRS Judgement and Order, no. U 2/2018-17 of 14 December 2021
ECtHR jurisprudence: Olujić v the Republic of Croatia, app. no. 22330/05, 5 February 2009,Fey v Austria, app. no. 14396/88, 24 February 1993,Ferrantelli and Santangelo v Italy, app. no. 19874/92, 7 August 1996, Švarc and Kavnik v Slovenia, app. no. 75617/01, 8 February 2007, Pullar v the United Kingdom, app. no. 22399/93, 10 June 1996, Mitrinovski v the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, app. no. 6899/12, 30 April 2015, Piersack v Belgium, app. no. 8692/79, 1 October 1982, Grieves v the United Kingdom, app. no. 57067/00, 16 October 2003, Miller and Others v the United Kingdom, app. nos. 45825/99, 45826/99 and 45827/99, 26 October 2004,Kyprianou v Cyprus, app. no. 73797/01,15 December 2005, Puolitaival and Pirttiaho v Finland, app. no. 54857/00, 23 November 2004,Mežnarič v Croatia, app. no. 71615/01,15 July 2005,Daktaras v Lithuania, app. no. 42095/98, 10 October 2000.
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Pest Central District Court,  C-564/19 IS case, ordinary, 11 July 2019
Deciding court: Pest Central District Court
Topic:  independence and accountability
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Denisov v. Ukraine (app. no. 76639/11)Ástráðsson v. Iceland  (app. no. 26374/18)
TRIIAL CASE

Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, Decision of 21st March 2013

Deciding court: Supreme Court of Justice 
Topic: Accountability, Organization of the Judiciary; Council of the Judiciary; disciplinary, civil and criminal liability of magistrates (judges and prosecutors).
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): Not applicable.  
ECtHR jurisprudence: Not applicable.  
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Administrative Court, I U 1478/2016-19, ordinary, 30 August 2017, ECLI:SI:UPRS:2017:I.U.1478.2016.19

Deciding court: Administrative Court of Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence (removal of magistrates, legal remedies for individual judges against dismissal decisions), accountability (Councils of the judiciary)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland (app. no. 632335/00, Grand Chamber, 19 April 2007) Oleksander Volkov v. Ukraine (app. no. 21722/11, 9 January 2013) Baka v. Hungary (app. no. 20261/12, Grand Chamber, 23 June 2016) G v. Finland (app. no. 33173/05, 27 January 2009) Harabin v. Slovakia (app. no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012) Olujić v. Croatia (app. no. 22330/05, 5 February 2005) Mitrinovski v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (app. no. 6899/12, 30 April 2015) Parlov-Tkalčič v. Croatia (app. no. 24810/06, 22 December 2009) Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland (app. no. 23614/0830 November 2010  Maktouf and Damjanović v. BiH (app. nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, Grand Chamber, 18 July 2013) Paluda v. Slovakia, (app. no. 33392/12, 23 May 2017) Saghatelyan v. Armenia, (app. no. 7984/06, 20 October 2015) Poposki and Duma v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (app. nos. 69916/10 and 36531/11,  7 January 2016) Jakšovski and Trifunovski v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, (app nos. 5681/09 and 58738/09, 7 January 2016) Moiseyev v. Russia (app. no. 62936, 9 October 2008) Agrokompleks v. Ukraine (app. no.23465/03, 6 October 2011) Scordino v. Italy, (no.1) (app. no. 36813/97, 29 March 2006, Grand Chamber) Hirschhorn v. Romania (app. no. 29294/02, 26 July 2007) Hornsby v. Greece (app. no. 18357/91, 19 March 1997) Kyrtatos v. Greece (app. no. 41666/98, 22 May 2003) Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy (app. no. 22774/93, 28 July 1999) Matheus c. France (app. no. 62740/00, 31 March 2005) Sabin Popescu v. Romania (app. no. 48102/99, 2 March 2004)
TRIIAL CASE

Slovenia, Constitutional Court, U-I-246/19-11, constitutional, 24 October 2019, ECLI:SI:USRS:2021:U.I.246.19; Constitutional Court, U-I-214/19-17, Up-1011/19-52, constitutional, 8 July 2021, ECLI:SI:USRS:2021:U.I.214.19

Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Accountability Independence (interference by the legislative branch),  Rule of law (prevention of abuse of powers) 
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence: Venice Commission Study no. 759/2014 of 25 March 2014: Amicus Curiae Brief in the case of Rywin v. Poland, paras. 6, 17, 31.  Kövesi v. Romania, 5 May 2020
TRIIAL CASE
Poland, Disciplinary Court of the Bar Association in Warsaw, Case no DZ 101/19, disciplinary court of bar association (I-instance), reference for a preliminary ruling: January 31, 2020. Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 January 2022 (Case C-55/20)
Deciding court: Disciplinary Court of the Bar Association in Warsaw
Topic: independence,  accountability, impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
Total Row: 41 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy