Total Row: 52 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Lisbon Court of Appeal, 3604/22.7YRLSB-3, Appellate, 11.01.2023.
Deciding court: Lisbon Court of Appeal
Topic: Judicial independence; Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 6 of the ECHR.
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, 27/16.0GEMMN.E1-A.S1, Supreme, 08.06.2022.
Deciding court: Supreme Court of Justice
Topic: Judicial independence; Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Articles 6 and 10 of the ECHR. Piersack v. Belgium, (8692/79); Cubber v. Belgium (9186/80); Borgers v. Belgium (12005/86); Micallef v. Malta (17056/06).
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, 24/14.0TELSB-FK.L1-A.S1, Supreme, 26.01.2022.
Deciding court: Supreme Court of Justice
Topic: Judicial independence; Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 10 of the ECHR.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Su 12/2023-13, instance: ordinary, 11 May 2023
Deciding court: Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic:  Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Su 293/2022, instance: ordinary, 27 October 2022
Deciding court: Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, The Ethics and Integrity Commission, Decision of 29 November 2016 - Public expression of a judge in interviews, instance: ordinary, 29 November 2016
Deciding court: Ethics and Integrity Commission of the Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic:  Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: European Convention on Human Rights, Article 10.Baka v. Hungary (GC), app. no. 20261/12, 23 June 2016
TRIIAL CASE
Italy, Tribunal of Milan, FR v. Ministero dell’Interno, ordinary instance, 9/5/2018
Deciding court: Tribunal of Milan
Topic: Impartiality (Conflict of Interest)Rule of law (Fair Trial/ Access to Justice)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): The national case is a direct follow up of the CJEU order of 27 September 2018
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 3 ECHRArticle 6 ECHRArticle 13 ECHRECtHR judgments:Gebremedhin v. France of 26 April 2007Hirsi Jamaa v. Italy of 23 February 2012Krombach v. France of 13 February 2001Annoni v. France of 14 November 2000
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Fővárosi Ítélőtábla Mellett Működő Elsőfokú Szolgálati Bíróság (First Instance Service Court attached to the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal), SZF1/46/2011 - Ravasz case, ordinary, 23 January 2012
Deciding court: First Instance Service Court attached to the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal
Topic: independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE
Czech Republic, Ústavní soud (Constitutional Court), II. ÚS 2490/15, constitutional, 8. 11. 2016
Deciding court: Constitutional Court
Topic: independence, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 10 European Convention on Human RightsDecision of the ECtHR from 28. 10. 1999, Wille v Lichtenstein, application no. 28396/95Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 2. 2007, Krasulya v Russia, application no. 12365/03
TRIIAL CASE
Czech Republic, Nejvyšší správní soud (Supreme Administrative Court), 13 Kss 5/2016-75, ordinary, 2. 11. 2016
Deciding court: Supreme Administrative Court
Topic: independence, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 10 European Convention on Human RightsDecision of the EctHR from 27. 5. 2014, Baka v Hungary, application no. 20261/12 Decision of the EctHR from 26. 2. 2009, Kudeshkina v Russia, application no. 29492/05Decision of the EctHR from 16. 9. 1999, Buscemi v Italy, application no. 29569/95Decision of the EctHR from 28. 10. 1999, Wille v Lichtenstein, application no. 28396/95
Total Row: 52 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy