Total Row: 101 / View:
Page:
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Lisbon Court of Appeal, 3604/22.7YRLSB-3, Appellate, 11.01.2023.
Deciding court: Lisbon Court of Appeal
Topic: Judicial independence; Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 6 of the ECHR.
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, 27/16.0GEMMN.E1-A.S1, Supreme, 08.06.2022.
Deciding court: Supreme Court of Justice
Topic: Judicial independence; Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Articles 6 and 10 of the ECHR. Piersack v. Belgium, (8692/79); Cubber v. Belgium (9186/80); Borgers v. Belgium (12005/86); Micallef v. Malta (17056/06).
TRIIAL CASE
Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, 24/14.0TELSB-FK.L1-A.S1, Supreme, 26.01.2022.
Deciding court: Supreme Court of Justice
Topic: Judicial independence; Impartiality
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Article 10 of the ECHR.
TRIIAL CASE
Court of Justice of the European Union, C-241/15 - Bob-Dogi case, Second Chamber, 1 June 2016
Deciding court: Court of Justice of the European Union
Topic:  mutual trust, independence
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Su 12/2023-13, instance: ordinary, 11 May 2023
Deciding court: Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic:  Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia, Decision Su 293/2022, instance: ordinary, 27 October 2022
Deciding court: Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court, U-I-445/18, 14 October 2021, ECLI:SI:USRS:2021:U.I.445.18
Deciding court: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic: Independence (removal of magistrates, legal remedies for individual judges against dismissal decisions), accountability (Councils of the judiciary)
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): VSRS Judgement and Order, no. U 2/2018-17 of 14 December 2021
ECtHR jurisprudence: Olujić v the Republic of Croatia, app. no. 22330/05, 5 February 2009,Fey v Austria, app. no. 14396/88, 24 February 1993,Ferrantelli and Santangelo v Italy, app. no. 19874/92, 7 August 1996, Švarc and Kavnik v Slovenia, app. no. 75617/01, 8 February 2007, Pullar v the United Kingdom, app. no. 22399/93, 10 June 1996, Mitrinovski v the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, app. no. 6899/12, 30 April 2015, Piersack v Belgium, app. no. 8692/79, 1 October 1982, Grieves v the United Kingdom, app. no. 57067/00, 16 October 2003, Miller and Others v the United Kingdom, app. nos. 45825/99, 45826/99 and 45827/99, 26 October 2004,Kyprianou v Cyprus, app. no. 73797/01,15 December 2005, Puolitaival and Pirttiaho v Finland, app. no. 54857/00, 23 November 2004,Mežnarič v Croatia, app. no. 71615/01,15 July 2005,Daktaras v Lithuania, app. no. 42095/98, 10 October 2000.
TRIIAL CASE
Slovenia, The Ethics and Integrity Commission, Decision of 29 November 2016 - Public expression of a judge in interviews, instance: ordinary, 29 November 2016
Deciding court: Ethics and Integrity Commission of the Judicial Council of the Republic of Slovenia
Topic:  Independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: European Convention on Human Rights, Article 10.Baka v. Hungary (GC), app. no. 20261/12, 23 June 2016
TRIIAL CASE
Hungary, Fővárosi Ítélőtábla Mellett Működő Elsőfokú Szolgálati Bíróság (First Instance Service Court attached to the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal), SZF1/46/2011 - Ravasz case, ordinary, 23 January 2012
Deciding court: First Instance Service Court attached to the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal
Topic: independence, accountability, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant):
ECtHR jurisprudence:
TRIIAL CASE
Czech Republic, Ústavní soud (Constitutional Court), II. ÚS 2490/15, constitutional, 8. 11. 2016
Deciding court: Constitutional Court
Topic: independence, impartiality, freedom of expression
National Follow Up Of (when relevant): N/A
ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 10 European Convention on Human RightsDecision of the ECtHR from 28. 10. 1999, Wille v Lichtenstein, application no. 28396/95Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 2. 2007, Krasulya v Russia, application no. 12365/03
Total Row: 101 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy