JUDCOOP CASE
CJEU, Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González, Case C?131/12
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information
JUDCOOP CASE
Greece, Council of State, Case 1901/2014 (Supreme Administrative Court)
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Greece - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 51 - Field of application
JUDCOOP CASE
Spain, Constitutional Court, nº 177/2015, 22 July 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of rights
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Court of Padua, n. 709/2018, 24 December 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland,Supreme Court, Minister for Justice & Equality v Ostrowski [2013] IESC 24, appellate, 15 May 2013, [2013] 5 JIC 1501
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Deferential approach - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External
Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Aziz, Judgement of 14 March 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Targu Mures, Sindicatul Liber, Judgement of 03 June 2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
External - Supra-national level - Internal - Vertical interaction
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 17 - Right to property - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Protocol 12 Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Constanta, Radu, Judgement of 11 March 2013, European Arrest Warrant
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Constitutional Court - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Bucharest, NGO ACCEPT v the National Council for Combating Discrimination
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Ordinary Court - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Sexual orientation
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy