JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Court of Appeal, R (AR) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Judgement of 28 June 2013
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 41 - Right to good administration
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, The Supreme Court, R (on the application of EM, EH, AE and MA v Secretary of State for the Home Department), Judgement of 19 February 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
The Netherlands, Judicial division of the Council of State, 201208550/1/V2, supreme, Judgement of 8 July 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
The Netherlands, Court of first instance of the Hague, Middelburg branch, Judgment of 11 August 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Spill-over dimension
Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 10 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Arslan, Judgement of 30 May 2013
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Czech Republic - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Germany, Supreme Administrative Court, Judgment of 31 March 2011
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Categories: Germany - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum
JUDCOOP CASE
Germany, Supreme Administrative Court, Judgment of 31 March 2011
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Categories: Germany - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy