Total Row: 18 / View:
Page:
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione), Section VI civil, 25 March 2015, Ordinance No. 5926
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Equivalent protection
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland, The High Court, Smith v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Judgement of 5 March 2012
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between provisions - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Upper Tribunal, ZAT and others case, judgement of
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 24 - The rights of the child - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, The Supreme Court, R (on the application of EM, EH, AE and MA v Secretary of State for the Home Department), Judgement of 19 February 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, England and Wales Court of Appeal, R v Ibrahim, Judgment of 27 April 2012
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, High Court, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al v British Telecommunications
Conflict: Conflict of rights - Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between rights - Proportionality test - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External - National level - Internal - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
The Netherlands, Judicial division of the Council of State, 201208550/1/V2, supreme, Judgement of 8 July 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
The Netherlands, Court of first instance of the Hague, Middelburg branch, Judgment of 11 August 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Spill-over dimension
Categories: The Netherlands - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 10 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Targu Mures, Sindicatul Liber, Judgement of 03 June 2009
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type: External - Supra-national level - Internal - Vertical interaction
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 17 - Right to property - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Protocol 12 Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination
JUDCOOP CASE
Croatia, Supreme Court of the Republic, Judgement of 17 February 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Croatia - National Courts - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
Total Row: 18 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy