JUDCOOP CASE
CJEU, Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, Case C-73/07
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Finland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
CJEU, Mesopotamia Broadcast A/S METV (C-244/10) and Roj TV A/S (C-245/10) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland, Graham Dwyer v. Data Commissioner, The High Court, n. 351/2015, 6 December 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level
Categories: Ireland - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Court of Padua, n. 709/2018, 24 December 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal
Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Targu Mures, Sindicatul Liber, Judgement of 03 June 2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
External - Supra-national level - Internal - Vertical interaction
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 17 - Right to property - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life - Art. 14 - Prohibition of discrimination - Protocol 12 Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination
JUDCOOP CASE
France, Conseil Constitutionnel, Jeremy F. v. Premier ministre
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Margin of appreciation - Mutual recognition
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Criminal law - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy