JUDCOOP CASE
Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, 48/12.2YREVR.S1, 5 June 2012
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - Internal
Categories: Portugal - National Courts - Supreme Court - Art. 11 - Freedom of expression and information - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Court of Padua, n. 709/2018, 24 December 2018
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Supreme Court - Ordinary Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
Portugal, Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court), 241/2002, 29 May 2002
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Portugal - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 8 - Protection of personal data
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal
Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Sanchez Marcello I & Sanchez Marcello II, Judgments of 17 July 2014, 16 July 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning I, NJA 2013 s 502, decision 11 June 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Supreme Court, Nytt Juridiskt Arkiv Avdelning, INJA 2013 s 502, Decision of 11 June 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Sweden, Gothenburg District Court, B 2683-09, Decision 25 January 2011
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Sweden - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Criminal law - Art. 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
Slovenia, Supreme Court, Case no Up 291/2016, Judgement of 10 March 2017
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Slovenia - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy