JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, A v. B and Others, judgment of 11 September 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Texdata, judgment of 26 September 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Austria - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Benkharbouche v Sudan and Janah v Libya Court of Appeal, 5 February 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Benkharbouche and Janah, judgement of 5 February 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - National level - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - Supreme Court - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Jeremy F., judgment of 30 May 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: France - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Radu, judgment of 29 January 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Romania - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Melloni, judgment of 26 February 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal
Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Aranyosi and C?ld?raru, judgment of 5 April 2016
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Germany - Court of Justice of European Union - Criminal law - Effective judicial protection - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
ECtHR, Avotins v. Latvia, judgment of 23 May 2016
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between courts - Mutual recognition
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External
Categories: European Court of Human Rights - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy