JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Tribunal of Rovereto, 19 November 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Italy - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Ordinary Court - Art. 10 - Freedom of expression
JUDCOOP CASE
United Kingdom, Benkharbouche v Sudan and Janah v Libya Court of Appeal, 5 February 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: United Kingdom - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Sanchez Marcello I & Sanchez Marcello II, Judgments of 17 July 2014, 16 July 2015
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - Effective judicial protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, The High Court, Radu, Decision no 2372/2013 of 17 July 2013, File no 1230/36/2009
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Deferential approach - Equivalent protection - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - National Courts - Supreme Court - Criminal law - Right to liberty and security - Art. 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence - Art. 5 - Right to liberty and security - Art. 6 - Right to a fair trial - CharterClick
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Aziz, Judgement of 14 March 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling - Dissenting judicial interpretation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Spain - Court of Justice of European Union - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Consumer protection - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Greece, Council of State, case number 1113/2014, Judgement of March 20th 2014
Conflict:
Conflict of rights
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - Internal
Categories: Greece - National Courts - Supreme Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Gender
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, C-83/14, CHEZ, Judgment of 16 July 2015
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Disapplication - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Race
JUDCOOP CASE
Romania, Court of Appeal Cluj, Judgement of May 31st 2013
Conflict:
Conflict of rights
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between rights - Interaction between courts - Margin of appreciation
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Romania - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Protocol 12 Art.1 - General prohibition of discrimination
JUDCOOP CASE
Poland, District Court Wroclaw, Judgement of August 3, 2016
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between provisions - Interaction between courts
Judicial interaction type:
Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Poland - Ordinary Court - Non-discrimination - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination
JUDCOOP CASE
Ireland, The High Court, Smith v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Judgement of 5 March 2012
Conflict:
Judicial interaction techniques:
Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Comparative reasoning - Interaction between provisions - Proportionality test
Judicial interaction type:
Horizontal interaction - External - Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ireland - National Courts - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life - Art. 21 - Non-discrimination - Art. 51 - Field of application - Art. 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy