Total Row: 33 / View:
Page:
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Abdida, Judgement of 18 December 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - Supra-national level - Vertical interaction - Internal
Categories: Belgium - Court of Justice of European Union - European Court of Human Rights - National Courts - Constitutional Court - Ordinary Court - Other body - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture - Art. 13 - Right to an effective remedy - Redial
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, A, B and C, Judgement of 4 December 2014
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: The Netherlands - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 7 - Respect for private and family life
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, C?429/15, Danqua, Judgement of 20 October 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Ireland - Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Art. 18 - Right to asylum
JUDCOOP CASE
European Union, CJEU, Case C?601/15 PPU J.N, Judgement of 15 February 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Horizontal interaction - External
Categories: Court of Justice of European Union - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Czech Republic, Constitutional Court, case no ÚS 860/15
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Czech Republic - Constitutional Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Supreme Court, case no 3-3-1-32-15, Judgement of 15 September 2015
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security
JUDCOOP CASE
Estonia, Riigikohus Supreme Court, Case no 3-3-1-14-16, Judgement of 3 March 2016
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Mutual adaptation of jurisprudence
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Right to liberty and security - Art. 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
JUDCOOP CASE
Slovenia, Supreme Court, Case no Up 291/2016, Judgement of 10 March 2017
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation - Interaction between courts - Preliminary ruling
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Slovenia - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition - Art. 52 - Scope and interpretation of rights and principles - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
JUDCOOP CASE
Slovenia, Constitutional Court, U-I-189/14, Up-663/14, Judgement of 15 October 2015
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External
Categories: Slovenia - Constitutional Court - Migration and asylum - Art. 19 - Protection in the event of removal expulsion or extradition
JUDCOOP CASE
Italy, Supreme Court of Cassation, Iyan v Minister for Internal Affairs and Ors,
Conflict: Conflict of interpretation
Judicial interaction techniques: Interpretative techniques - Consistent interpretation
Judicial interaction type: Vertical interaction - External - Internal
Categories: Italy - Supreme Court - Migration and asylum - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment - Art. 18 - Right to asylum - Art. 3 - Prohibition of torture
Total Row: 33 / View:
Page:
 
Project implemented with financial support of the Fundamental Rights & Citizenship Programme of the European Union
© European University Institute 2019
Villa Schifanoia - Via Boccaccio 121, I-50133 Firenze - Italy