The CJC specific training methodology is based on the premise that judicial training is a continuous process which should be the result of mutual exchange and learning between academics and legal practitioners, and between legal practitioners from different jurisdictions, Member States, and legal traditions. Our methodology includes a toolkit that offers not only basic, detailed information but also stimulates the active engagement of legal practitioners with the practical problems concerning the scope and application of fundamental rights.
The objectives of the CJC training methodology are the following:
– Creation of a common legal culture
– Enhancement of mutual trust and exchange
– Dissemination of judicial interaction techniques.
Therefore, the training tools elaborated by the CJC are not the result of an academic exercise; rather, they are based on direct and continuous collaboration with the legal practitioners, selecting and testing the most relevant issues, and consequently national and European cases, that are then included in the training tools made available to the public.
Given that there is an increasing body of rules that are not only based, but also influenced and affected by EU law in many fields, legal practitioners may have difficulties in understanding the boundary between purely national and “unionised” legal rules, which have to be benchmarked against a different set of fundamental principles.
In this sense, the CJC toolkit provides for a full-fledged training where the EU’s most recent legislative and judicial intervention are analysed from both the European and national perspectives.
Online Training Courses
e-NACT 0 is an introductory additional course allowing all the learners to test and update their knowledge on the general principles connected with triggering the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in national contexts.Find Out More
This course offers an overview of the main challenges in the protection of what can be considered a cornerstone of European democracies: freedom of expression. Taking the protection afforded by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention of Human Rights, the course will guide you through different facets of freedom of expression, showing you how far each citizen may exercise his right but also when the State may legitimately limit the possibility to speak out.Find Out More
The course takes learners across the general presentation of the varieties of contexts where children’s rights emerge. In doing so, it builds on the guiding principle of the best interest of the child both in the EU and international context.Find Out More [EN] Find Out More [FR]
This course offers an overview of the main challenges in the protection of social rights, easily one of the most sensitive topics in EU politics. Contrary to other legal systems solely dedicated to the protection of social rights (such as the International Labour Organisation or the European Social Charter of the Council of Europe), the EU has a broader political and economic agenda.Find Out More
This course will provide an overview of one of the crucial areas of law, namely the right to the protection of personal data and the right to privacy, provided by Articles 8 and 7 of the EU Charter.Find Out More
The course is aimed at providing the audience with knowledge and skills on a very sensitive topic, especially since many migrants moving from third countries to Member States are in vulnerable conditions.Find Out More
Residential Training Courses
organised by University of Pompeu Fabra – in Barcelona + online
OverviewThe European arrest warrant (EAW) is the most emblematic instrument of mutual recognition in the field of criminal law. The well-functioning of the EAW is based upon mutual trust, and mutual trust is founded on the presumption that the criminal courts of the EU Member States are independent. What are the consequences for the EAW when the independence of the issuing judicial authority is questioned? Under what circumstances may the execution of a European arrest warrant be refused on grounds of lack of judicial independence? The goal of this workshop is to provide the tools to answer these questions and enhance the understanding and application of the criteria developed by the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. The analysis will focus on the challenges for judicial independence in the context of the rule of law backsliding, the independence of prosecutors when they have been designated as the issuing judicial authority, and more generally the consequences for mutual trust and mutual recognition when the requirement of judicial independence is at stake.
ProgrammeThursday 21 March 9:15-9:30 Welcome 9:30-11:00 Panel 1. Mutual trust and rule of law backsliding 11:00-11:20 Coffee break 11:20-13:00 Working groups 13:00-14:00 Lunch 14:00-16:00 Panel 2. Perspectives from national judges Friday 22 March 9:15-10:30 Panel 3. The independence of prosecutors as the issuing judicial authority 10:30-10:50 Coffee break 10:50-12:30 Working groups 12:30-13:30 Roundtable discussion on mutual trust and judicial independence: the case of Puig Gordi and Others Cross-border training event for prosecutors and judges, 21–22 March 2024, organized by Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Barcelona, residential + online mode Framework: This workshop is offered within the European Commission’s funded project TRIIAL 2 – TRust, Independence, Impartiality and Accountability of Legal professionals under the EU Charter (project no. 101089737, JUST-JTRA-EJTR-AG-2020). The TRIIAL 2 Project provides training activities and tools for judges, attorneys, and prosecutors on the European rule of law, mutual trust, judicial independence, impartiality and accountability (see the dedicated website here).
Target groupPublic prosecutors, attorneys and judges from European Union (EU) countries. The training will be in English and opened to those with both basic and experienced knowledge of EU law and ECHR. The Workshop will host 40 participants, of which 15 will be in person and 25 online. Participation is free of charge. For the 15 in-person participants, the travel, accommodation and meals at the venue are covered by the organizer. Participants will be provided with certificates of participation.
ApplicationThe deadline for the submission of applications is 15th of January 2024. Submit your application, including the documents mentioned below, to David.email@example.com. You should mention in the title of your email whether you want to participate in-person or online. Italian judges are invited to submit their applications to: firstname.lastname@example.org. For questions, please contact Gianluca Grasso at: email@example.com Romanian attorneys are invited to submit their applications to: firstname.lastname@example.org. The following documents shall be attached to the application:
- CV in English (including a section on proof of knowledge of English)
- A short motivation letter (max 2 pages) outlining the candidate’s specific reasons for applying to a Workshop on Mutual Trust and Judicial Independence in the EAW Framework (please describe how your professional activity correlates to the workshop’s field of interest and how you could both benefit from and contribute to the Workshop in this field)
Selection ProcedureThe assessment of applications will be based on the following criteria:
- Gender and age balanced;
- Geographically balanced;
- Balance in the judicial hierarchy: both higher and lower instance courts shall be represented among selected participants;
- Trainers will have priority in selection (please refer to relevant training responsibilities in your CV);
- Knowledge of and experience with fundamental rights and rule of law issues;
- Good knowledge of English;
- Single participation within the same Training Project (TRIIAL 2): in principle, no participant can take part in more than one Workshop among those offered within the TRIIAL 2 Project.
Outcome of the Workshop
- You will receive a certificate of participation;
- You will be able to understand and explain the main legal issues relating to the European rule of law (the training’s “core”);
- You will be able to identify the standard of effective judicial protection under Article 47 EU CFR and the role of the ECHR and the case law of the Strasbourg Court to determine it;
- You will become familiar with the procedural steps through which the existence of a duty to pursue or suspend horizontal judicial cooperation exists;
- You will become familiar with the allocation of the burden of proof in cases concerning the implications of rule of law problems on mutual trust, as well as understand how that burden can be satisfied;
- You will be able to establish whether the solution of the pending case requires the involvement of the Court of Justice through the reference for preliminary ruling;
- You will be able to find cases decided by the Court of Justice or national courts which can help you solving the pending case or supporting your legal arguments;
- You will understand how to implement the relevant case law of the Court of Justice in your case;
- You will acquire the ability to relate the knowledge acquired to the cases you are dealing with in your legal practice;
- You will be able to create and design new arguments to convincingly plead your case where issues concerning mutual trust and the rule of law arise;
- You will become part of a network of legal practitioners and scholars dealing with similar issues that could provide support for future questions.
organised by Centre for Judicial Cooperation
1-2 July 2024
DEADLINE FOR APPLICATIONS
30 March 2024
The ‘Transnational Training Workshop’, involving legal practitioners from EU Member States, will take place in the framework of the Facilex Project (Facilitating Mutual Recognition: Analytics and Capacity Building Information Legal Explainable Tool to Strengthen Cooperation in the Criminal Matter). For more details about the project, please visit the webpage: https://site.unibo.it/facilex/en/the-project
This workshop aims to improve knowledge on horizontal harmonization relating to three EU mutual recognition instruments: European Arrest Warrant, European Investigation Order, Reg. 1805/2018 on the mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders.
To achieve these objectives, a selection of the most relevant issues revolving around the lack of judicial harmonization will be analyzed during the Transnational Training Workshop. It will be devoted to the analysis of the most relevant-case law surrounding the three EU mutual recognition systems with special focus on effective judicial protection, procedural rights, and fundamental rights protection.
Each day will be split in two parts: in the first part, 3 renowned practitioners and lecturers will deliver distinguished lectures; in the second part, practical sessions involving case analysis and discussion on hypothetical will be facilitated by working groups activities.
In particular, legal analysis of case studies will be conveyed through the explanatory use of Facilex Platform (available from Spring 2024) that provides a database of EU and national legislation and case-law as well as an automated legal advice tool aimed at customizing legal assessment on available legal remedies. The platform will build upon an already existing advisory tool, focused on the procedural rights of defendants, which can be already freely accessed here.
Useful materials for the Working Groups’ activities included in a User Manual will be shared in advance with selected participants.
The event is particularly aimed at:
- Lawyers/ representatives of bar associations
- Judicial/prosecuting authorities
- Legal Officers
- NGO Operators
- Researchers/academics in the field of Criminal Justice and Fundamental Rights
The first 15 applicants will be selected by EUI-Centre for Judicial Cooperation for participation on premise. The non-shortlisted participants can attend the Facilex Transnational Workshop remotely on zoom upon registration to the event.
The deadline for the submission of applications is 30th March2024.
Submit your application, including the documents mentioned below, to email@example.com You should mention in the title of your email the title of the workshop.
The following documents shall be attached to the application:
- CV in English (including a section on proof of knowledge of English)
- A brief motivation letter in English explaining the candidate’s reasons of applying, how he or she would benefit from and contribute to the project. This letter should not merely restate the candidate’s CV.
Applicants will be notified about the result of the selection process by 15th of April 2024.
The selection process aims to identify participants who will effectively and substantially contribute to dissemination of project results.
Thus, candidates are expected to have:
- An excellent knowledge of English language.
- A general knowledge of and experience in the topic of the workshop.
The selection will ensure the following criteria:
- Inter-disciplinary representativity: the selection will ensure, as much as possible, equal representation of legal practitioners working on civil, criminal and administrative cases. The mix of those three categories shall depend on the topic of a particular workshop.
- Gender balance.
- Age balance.
- Geographical representation: Geographical distribution shall be taken into account, with the aim of selecting participants who work in different areas and regions within the participating countries.
Participants are expected to commit to all sessions of the workshop and actively participate in the working groups. They are also asked to prepare for the workshop by reading relevant materials provided by the organizers in advance.
Applicants are not required to have participated in similar training programmes before, nor will recent participation in similar training programmes necessarily prevent them from being accepted.
The selected candidates are expected to acquire awareness from the distributed materials, as well as to be ready to commit to the active participation in the workshop and its follow-up activities.