Call for Applications – Freedom of expression vs. pressures to judicial independence, impartiality and accountability

5th November 2021 @ 4:00 pm – 6th November 2021 @ 1:00 pm Europe/Rome Timezone
Hybrid formula (on site Warsaw and zoom platform)

Law and Society Institute Foundation in Warsaw – INPRIS – invites European legal practitioners to a hybrid workshop on “Freedom of expression vs. pressures to judicial independence, impartiality and accountability”, November 5-6th 2021, hybrid formula (on site Warsaw and zoom platform).

The training is offered within the European Commission’s funded project TRIIAL – TRust, Independence, Impartiality and Accountability of judges and arbitrators safeguarding the rule of Law under the EU Charter (project no. 853832, JUST-JTRA-EJTR-AG-2018). The TRIIAL Project provides training activities and tools for judges, lawyers, prosecutors, and arbitrators on the European rule of law, mutual trust, judicial independence, impartiality and accountability. More information on the TRIIAL Project can be accessed here.

What is the Cross-Border Training Workshop about?

This cross-border training workshop will address two interconnected topics: the freedom of expression of legal professionals and the rule of law in Europe.

In the last few years, several Member States have witnessed an unprecedented decline in the rule of law, one of the core EU values upon which the EU is funded according to Article 2 TEU. Polish and Hungarian judicial “reforms” led to a structural breakdown, which no longer makes it possible to talk about independence and impartiality of their judiciaries (e.g. C-791/19, § 64). While other Member States endure for the moment, it is becoming increasingly questionable, whether their institutions are robust enough to withstand the present and future attempts to undermine the independence of their justice systems.

These developments have triggered a response from the CJEU and the ECtHR. Both Courts have for example extensively dealt with questions regarding the compatibility of domestic accountability systems with EU law and ECHR (C-585/18, C-624/18, and C-625/18, C- 83/19, C-127/19 and C-195/19, C-355/19; C-791/19, Baka v Hungary, L.P and Carvalho v Portugal, Guz v Poland, Kövesi v. Romania, Panioglu v. Romania). This Workshop therefore looks at the most recent European standards on accountability of legal professions and freedom of expression and seeks to understand their role in addressing the threats to the rule of law, emanating not only from the governments, but also from within the third branch. Traditionally, legal professionals, especially judges and prosecutors, have refrained from voicing their opinion in order to ensure their impartiality and the authority of their institutions. The duty of restraint has been regarded as a prerequisite for public confidence, necessary for successful fulfilment of the role of the judiciary in a democratic society. However, nowadays legal professionals more often than ever find themselves in a difficult position: they have a (moral) duty to speak out in the face of affronts to the rule of law, yet fulfillment of such a duty could expose them to disciplinary and other sanctions.

Could the current challenges to independent judicial systems be regarded as a call for a re- examination of duty of discretion and perhaps for adjustments to the existing norm, especially as the perception that legal professionals should show restraint could be abused as an excuse for disciplining the independent-minded? What are the risks of leaving more freedom (of expression) to legal professionals? What are the downsides of upholding the rule of law in concrete legal proceedings and what could be the advantages of exploring new means to defend this fundamental EU value? What about threats from within the judiciary, how to address these challenges without harming the authority of the court? Do short-term benefits of sanctioning critics of the judiciary outweigh the potential improvement of the judicial system that their criticism might bring in the long-term? This workshop will raise these and other intriguing questions, without necessarily providing clear-cut answers. Instead, it will strive to equip the participants with legal knowledge on the scope and content of their fundamental right to free speech as well as on procedural guarantees and avenues for its protection, ultimately empowering them to better defend the rule of law in their daily work and beyond.


You will learn through:

– a 2-half day online workshop, including:
1. lectures and discussion sessions on wider socio-political context, affecting the judicial systems and the everyday challenges of legal professionals as well as on the most relevant European and national case law;
2. a hypothetical case session, where participants will discuss real legal issues through a case, replicating real life scenarios, in small groups; o interactive discussion roundtable.
3. preparatory materials distributed to registered participants in advance of the training. Notably, you will be provided access to the TRIIAL online training platform featuring a module, designed especially for this workshop, a background module on the European rule of law and the mechanisms for its enforcement, and a module on accountability and freedom of expression. You will also be given access to a data-base gathering a selection of the most relevant European and national case law, which is summarized and analyzed in English.

Who should attend?

Judges and other legal practitioners.
There will be at least 30 participants from any EU Member State. While the target group are Polish judges and lawyers, we welcome judges and lawyers from across the EU Member States.
The participation is free of charge. Participants will be provided with certificates of participation.


The working language for first day will be English, with simultaneous translation to Polish. The second day of workshop will be conducted in Polish.

What can you expect after the completion of the training? This Cross Border Workshop will strive towards enabling you:

to understand and explain the main legal issues relating to the European rule of law;

to understand the threats to the rule of law from outside and from within the judiciary, and your role in upholding this fundamental EU value;

to become familiar with the ECtHR standards concerning freedom of expression of legal professionals and with the recent CJEU case-law, providing a new avenue for protection of this right;

to identify the standard of effective judicial protection under Article 19 TEU and to become familiar the with the differences in scope, purpose and threshold between Article 19 TEU, Article 267 TFEU and Article 47 CFREU;

to understand the different underlying premises that govern the freedom of expression of different groups of professionals within the judicial system;

to become familiar with the national case law concerning freedom of expression of legal professionals;

to determine, whether the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU is applicable in a certain case or not;

to be able to establish whether the solution of the pending case requires the involvement of the Court of Justice through the reference for preliminary ruling;

to become part of a network of legal practitioners and scholars dealing with similar issues that could provide support for future questions.

Selection Process

The workshop is open to 30 legal practitioners (judges , lawyers, arbitrators), from any EU country. Applicants are invited to fill the linked form by November the1st, 2021:

Application requirements

  1. Active legal practitioner from EU country (retired judges/prosecutors can be accepted by organizers decision);
  2. A brief motivation of the candidate’s reasons of applying, how he or she would benefit from and contribute to the project.
    Applicants will be notified about the result of the selection process by November the 10th, 2021.

Selection criteria

The selection process aims to identify participants who will effectively and substantially contribute to dissemination of project results. Thus, candidates are expected to have a general knowledge of and experience in the topic of the workshop. However, applicants are neither required to have participated in similar training programmes before, nor will recent participation in similar training programmes necessarily prevent them from being accepted. English is not a requirement, but an advantage in the selection procedure.

The selection will ensure the following criteria:
1. Single participation principle: applicants that already took part to TRIIAL training activities may be selected exceptionally. Exceptions are at the discretion of Institute of Law and Society in agreement with the Project Coordinator, the Centre of Judicial Cooperation of the European University Institute;

2. Gender balance;

3. Age balance.

Participants are asked to devote the necessary time to this training. If selected, participants must attend all sessions of the workshop. They are also asked to prepare for the workshop by reading the relevant materials in advance. The selected candidates are expected to be ready to commit to the active participation in the workshop.

Contact person and general information

For any information on the workshop or doubts concerning the call for application, please contact Joanna Gądek – Kutner

Download the programme